There's not an exact equivalent to convert a Postgresql query that makes use of SELECT DISTINCT ON to MySQL.
Postgresql SELECT DISTINCT ON
In Postgresql, the following query will eliminate all rows where the expressions (col1, col2, col3)
match, and it will only keep the "first col4, col5 row" for each set of matched rows:
SELECT DISTINCT ON (col1, col2, col3) col4, col5
FROM tablename
So if your table is like this:
col1 | col2 | col3 | col4 | col5
--------------------------------
1 | 2 | 3 | 777 | 888
1 | 2 | 3 | 888 | 999
3 | 3 | 3 | 555 | 555
our query will keep just one row for (1,2,3) and one row for (3,3,3). The resulting rows will then be:
col4 | col5
-----------
777 | 888
555 | 555
please notice that the "first row" of each set is unpredictable, our fist row might be (888, 999) as well unless we specify an ORDER BY:
SELECT DISTINCT ON (col1, col2, col3) col4, col5
FROM tablename
ORDER BY col1, col2, col3, col4
(the DISTINCT on expressions must match the leftmost ORDER BY expressions, but the ORDER BY can contain additional expressions).
MySQL extension to GROUP BY
MySQL extends the use of GROUP BY so that we can select nonaggregated columns not named in the GROUP BY clause. Whenever we select nonaggregated columns the server is free to choose any value from each group from that column, so the resulting values will be indetermined.
So this Postgresql query:
SELECT DISTINCT ON (col1, col2, col3) col4, col5
FROM tablename
can be considered equivalent to this MySQL query:
SELECT col4, col5
FROM tablename
GROUP BY col1, col2, col3
both Postgresql and MySQL will return the "First row" for each (col1, col2, col3), and in both cases the row returned is unpredictable because we didn't specify and order by clause.
A lot of people would be very tempted to convert this Postgresql query with an ORDER BY:
SELECT DISTINCT ON (col1, col2, col3) col4, col5
FROM tablename
ORDER BY col1, col2, col3, col4
with this one:
SELECT col4, col5
FROM (
SELECT col1, col2, col3, col4, col5
FROM tablename
ORDER BY col1, col2, col3, col4
) s
GROUP BY col1, col2, col3
the idea here is to apply an ORDER BY to a subquery so that when MySQL groups by col1, col2, col3 it will keep the first encountered value for col4 and col5. The idea is good, but it's wrong! MySQL is free to choose any value for col4 and col5, and we don't know which are the first values encountered, it depends on the optimizer. So I would correct it to this:
SELECT t1.col4, t1.col5
FROM tablename t1 INNER JOIN (SELECT col1, col2, col3, MIN(col4) as m_col4
FROM tablename
GROUP BY col1, col2, col3) s
ON t1.col1=s.col1
AND t1.col2=s.col2
AND t1.col3=s.col3
AND t1.col4=s.m_col4
GROUP BY
t1.col1, t1.col2, t1.col3, t1.col4
but this is starting to get more complicated.
Conclusion
As a general rule, there's not an exact way to convert a Postgresql query to a MySQL query, but there are a lot of workarounds, the resulting query might be as simple as the original one or it might become very complicated, but it depends on the query itself.