Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
478 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

networking - C# Begin/EndReceive - how do I read large data?

When reading data in chunks of say, 1024, how do I continue to read from a socket that receives a message bigger than 1024 bytes until there is no data left? Should I just use BeginReceive to read a packet's length prefix only, and then once that is retrieved, use Receive() (in the async thread) to read the rest of the packet? Or is there another way?

edit:

I thought Jon Skeet's link had the solution, but there is a bit of a speedbump with that code. The code I used is:

public class StateObject
{
    public Socket workSocket = null;
    public const int BUFFER_SIZE = 1024;
    public byte[] buffer = new byte[BUFFER_SIZE];
    public StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
}

public static void Read_Callback(IAsyncResult ar)
{
    StateObject so = (StateObject) ar.AsyncState;
    Socket s = so.workSocket;
    
    int read = s.EndReceive(ar);
    
    if (read > 0) 
    {
        so.sb.Append(Encoding.ASCII.GetString(so.buffer, 0, read));

        if (read == StateObject.BUFFER_SIZE)
        {
            s.BeginReceive(so.buffer, 0, StateObject.BUFFER_SIZE, 0, 
                    new AyncCallback(Async_Send_Receive.Read_Callback), so);
            return;
        }
    }
    
    if (so.sb.Length > 0)
    {
        //All of the data has been read, so displays it to the console
        string strContent;
        strContent = so.sb.ToString();
        Console.WriteLine(String.Format("Read {0} byte from socket" + 
        "data = {1} ", strContent.Length, strContent));
    }
    s.Close();
}

Now this corrected works fine most of the time, but it fails when the packet's size is a multiple of the buffer. The reason for this is if the buffer gets filled on a read it is assumed there is more data; but the same problem happens as before. A 2 byte buffer, for exmaple, gets filled twice on a 4 byte packet, and assumes there is more data. It then blocks because there is nothing left to read. The problem is that the receive function doesn't know when the end of the packet is.


This got me thinking to two possible solutions: I could either have an end-of-packet delimiter or I could read the packet header to find the length and then receive exactly that amount (as I originally suggested).

There's problems with each of these, though. I don't like the idea of using a delimiter, as a user could somehow work that into a packet in an input string from the app and screw it up. It also just seems kinda sloppy to me.

The length header sounds ok, but I'm planning on using protocol buffers - I don't know the format of the data. Is there a length header? How many bytes is it? Would this be something I implement myself? Etc..

What should I do?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

No - call BeginReceive again from the callback handler, until EndReceive returns 0. Basically, you should keep on receiving asynchronously, assuming you want the fullest benefit of asynchronous IO.

If you look at the MSDN page for Socket.BeginReceive you'll see an example of this. (Admittedly it's not as easy to follow as it might be.)


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...