Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
986 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

rust - Why does passing a closure to function which accepts a function pointer not work?

In the second edition of The Rust Programming Language (emphasis mine):

Function pointers implement all three of the closure traits (Fn, FnMut, and FnOnce), so you can always pass a function pointer as an argument for a function that expects a closure. It’s best to write functions using a generic type and one of the closure traits so your functions can accept either functions or closures.

Passing a closure to a function which accepts a function pointer as an argument doesn't compile:

fn main() {
    let a = String::from("abc");

    let x = || println!("{}", a);

    fn wrap(c: fn() -> ()) -> () {
        c()
    }

    wrap(x);
}
error[E0308]: mismatched types
  --> src/main.rs:10:10
   |
10 |     wrap(x);
   |          ^ expected fn pointer, found closure
   |
   = note: expected type `fn()`
              found type `[closure@src/main.rs:4:13: 4:33 a:_]`

Why does this not work?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

There are certain cases where you can pass a closure as a function pointer. This works:

fn main() {
    let x = || {
        let a = String::from("abc");
        println!("{}", a);
    };

    fn wrap(c: fn()) {
        c()
    }

    wrap(x);
}

The important difference is that the closure is not allowed to capture anything from its environment. That means that we had to prevent the String from crossing the closure boundary.

Any closure that doesn't capture environment can be trivially rewritten as a anonymous standalone function and then converted into a function pointer.

Once you add an environment, it is no longer convertible and everything from the existing answer applies.

Note that stating -> () is non-idiomatic as that's the default if nothing is specified.

See also:


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...