use map
to perform a lookup:
In [46]:
df['1st'] = df['1st'].map(idxDict)
df
Out[46]:
1st 2nd
0 a 2
1 b 4
2 c 6
to avoid the situation where there is no valid key you can pass na_action='ignore'
You can also use df['1st'].replace(idxDict)
but to answer you question about efficiency:
timings
In [69]:
%timeit df['1st'].replace(idxDict)
%timeit df['1st'].map(idxDict)
1000 loops, best of 3: 1.57 ms per loop
1000 loops, best of 3: 1.08 ms per loop
In [70]:
%%timeit
for k,v in idxDict.items():
df ['1st'] = df ['1st'].replace(k, v)
100 loops, best of 3: 3.25 ms per loop
So using map
is over 3x faster here
on a larger dataset:
In [3]:
df = pd.concat([df]*10000, ignore_index=True)
df.shape
Out[3]:
(30000, 2)
In [4]:
%timeit df['1st'].replace(idxDict)
%timeit df['1st'].map(idxDict)
100 loops, best of 3: 18 ms per loop
100 loops, best of 3: 4.31 ms per loop
In [5]:
%%timeit
for k,v in idxDict.items():
df ['1st'] = df ['1st'].replace(k, v)
100 loops, best of 3: 18.2 ms per loop
For 30K row df, map
is ~4x faster so it scales better than replace
or looping
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…