Mikael Eriksson has a good explanation bellow why the first query is fast:
SQL server optimize it into:
if exists(select * from BookChapters)
. So it goes looking for the presence of one row instead of counting all the rows in the table.
For the other two queries, SQL Server would use the following rule. To perform a query like SELECT COUNT(*)
, SQL Server will use the narrowest
non-clustered index to count the rows. If the table does not have any
non-clustered index, it will have to scan the table.
Also, if your table has a clustered index you can get your count even faster using the following query (borrowed from this site Get Row Counts Fast!)
--SQL Server 2005/2008
SELECT OBJECT_NAME(i.id) [Table_Name], i.rowcnt [Row_Count]
FROM sys.sysindexes i WITH (NOLOCK)
WHERE i.indid in (0,1)
ORDER BY i.rowcnt desc
--SQL Server 2000
SELECT OBJECT_NAME(i.id) [Table_Name], i.rows [Row_Count]
FROM sysindexes i (NOLOCK)
WHERE i.indid in (0,1)
ORDER BY i.rows desc
It uses sysindexes system table. More info you can find here SQL Server 2000, SQL Server 2005, SQL Server 2008, SQL Server 2012
Here is another link Why is my SELECT COUNT(*) running so slow? with another solution. It shows technique that Microsoft uses to quickly display the number of rows when you right click on the table and select properties.
select sum (spart.rows)
from sys.partitions spart
where spart.object_id = object_id(’YourTable’)
and spart.index_id < 2
You should find that this returns very quickly no matter how many tables you have.
If you are using SQL 2000 still you can use the sysindexes table to get the number.
select max(ROWS)
from sysindexes
where id = object_id(’YourTable’)
This number may be slightly off depending on how often SQL updates the sysindexes table, but it’s usually corrent (or at least close enough).
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…