Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
553 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

asp.net mvc - HttpPost vs HttpGet attributes in MVC: Why use HttpPost?

So we have [HttpPost], which is an optional attribute. I understand this restricts the call so it can only be made by an HTTP POST request. My question is why would I want to do this?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Imagine the following:

[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Edit(int id) { ... }

[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Edit(MyEditViewModel myEditViewModel) { ... }

This wouldn't be possible unless the ActionMethodSelectorAttributes HttpGet and HttpPost where used. This makes it really simple to create an edit view. All the action links just points right back to the controller. If the view model validates false, you just pop right back to the edit view again.

I will be bold and say this is best practice when it comes to CRUDish things in ASP.NET MVC.

EDIT:

@TheLight asked what was needed in the view to accomplish the post. It's simply just a form with method POST.

Using Razor, this would look something like this.

@using (Html.BeginForm())
{
    <input type="text" placeholder="Enter email" name="email" />
    <input type="submit" value="Sign Up" />
}

This renders the following HTML:

<form action="/MyController/Edit" method="post">    
    <input type="text" name="email" placeholder="Enter email">
    <input type="submit" value="Sign Up">
</form>

When the form is submitted, it will perform an Http Post request to the controller. The action with the HttpPost attribute will handle the request.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...