Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
272 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

r - How to parametrize function calls in dplyr 0.7?

The release of dplyr 0.7 includes a major overhaul of programming with dplyr. I read this document carefully, and I am trying to understand how it will impact my use of dplyr.

Here is a common idiom I use when building reporting and aggregation functions with dplyr:

my_report <- function(data, grouping_vars) {
  data %>%
    group_by_(.dots=grouping_vars) %>%
    summarize(x_mean=mean(x), x_median=median(x), ...)
}

Here, grouping_vars is a vector of strings.

I like this idiom because I can pass in string vectors from other places, say a file or a Shiny app's reactive UI, but it's also not too bad for interactive work either.

However, in the new programming with dplyr vignette, I see no examples of how something like this can be done with the new dplyr. I only see examples of how passing strings is no longer the correct approach, and I have to use quosures instead.

I'm happy to adopt quosures, but how exactly do I get from strings to the quosures expected by dplyr here? It doesn't seem feasible to expect the entire R ecosystem to provide quosures to dplyr - lots of times we're going to get strings and they'll have to be converted.

Here is an example showing what you're now supposed to do, and how my old idiom doesn't work:

library(dplyr)
grouping_vars <- quo(am)
mtcars %>%
  group_by(!!grouping_vars) %>%
  summarise(mean_cyl=mean(cyl))
#> # A tibble: 2 × 2
#>      am mean_cyl
#>   <dbl>    <dbl>
#> 1     0 6.947368
#> 2     1 5.076923

grouping_vars <- "am"
mtcars %>%
  group_by(!!grouping_vars) %>%
  summarise(mean_cyl=mean(cyl))
#> # A tibble: 1 × 2
#>   `"am"` mean_cyl
#>    <chr>    <dbl>
#> 1     am   6.1875
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

dplyr will have a specialized group_by function group_by_at to deal with multiple grouping variables. It would be much easier to use the new member of the _at family:

# using the pre-release 0.6.0

cols <- c("am","gear")

mtcars %>%
    group_by_at(.vars = cols) %>%
    summarise(mean_cyl=mean(cyl))

# Source: local data frame [4 x 3]
# Groups: am [?]
# 
# am  gear mean_cyl
# <dbl> <dbl>    <dbl>
# 1     0     3 7.466667
# 2     0     4 5.000000
# 3     1     4 4.500000
# 4     1     5 6.000000

The .vars argument accepts both character/numeric vector or column names generated by vars:

.vars

A list of columns generated by vars(), or a character vector of column names, or a numeric vector of column positions.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...