Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
402 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c# - Can Newtonsoft Json.NET skip serializing empty lists?

I am trying to serialize some legacy objects that "lazy creates" various lists. I can not change the legacy behavior.

I have boiled it down to this simple example:

public class Junk
{
    protected int _id;

    [JsonProperty( PropertyName = "Identity" )]
    public int ID 
    { 
        get
        {
            return _id;
        }

        set
        {
            _id = value;
        }
    }

    protected List<int> _numbers;
    public List<int> Numbers
    {
        get
        {
            if( null == _numbers )
            {
                _numbers = new List<int>( );
            }

            return _numbers;
        }

        set
        {
            _numbers = value;
        }
    }
}

class Program
{
    static void Main( string[] args )
    {
        Junk j = new Junk( ) { ID = 123 };

        string newtonSoftJson = JsonConvert.SerializeObject( j, Newtonsoft.Json.Formatting.Indented );

        Console.WriteLine( newtonSoftJson );

    }
}

The current results are: { "Identity": 123, "Numbers": [] }

I would like to get: { "Identity": 123 }

That is, I would like to skip any lists, collections, arrays, or such things that are empty.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

In case you didn't find a solution to this, the answer is remarkably simple when you manage to track it down.

If you are permitted to extend the original class then add a ShouldSerializePropertyName function to it. This should return a Boolean indicating whether or not that property should be serialized for the current instance of the class. In your example this might look like this (not tested but you should get the picture):

public bool ShouldSerializeNumbers()
{
    return _numbers.Count > 0;
}

This approach works for me (albeit in VB.NET). If you're not allowed to modify the original class then the IContractResolver approach described on the the linked page is the way to go.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...