For completeness, in numpy >= 1.8 you can also use np.add
's at
method:
In [8]: m, n = np.random.rand(2, 10)
In [9]: m_idx, n_idx = np.random.randint(10, size=(2, 20))
In [10]: m0 = m.copy()
In [11]: np.add.at(m, m_idx, n[n_idx])
In [13]: m0 += np.bincount(m_idx, weights=n[n_idx], minlength=len(m))
In [14]: np.allclose(m, m0)
Out[14]: True
In [15]: %timeit np.add.at(m, m_idx, n[n_idx])
100000 loops, best of 3: 9.49 us per loop
In [16]: %timeit np.bincount(m_idx, weights=n[n_idx], minlength=len(m))
1000000 loops, best of 3: 1.54 us per loop
Aside of the obvious performance disadvantage, it has a couple of advantages:
np.bincount
converts its weights to double precision floats, .at
will operate with you array's native type. This makes it the simplest option for dealing e.g. with complex numbers.
np.bincount
only adds weights together, you have an at
method for all ufuncs, so you can repeatedly multiply
, or logical_and
, or whatever you feel like.
But for your use case, np.bincount
is probably the way to go.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…