Quoting from here,
In C, there are two different namespaces of types: a namespace of struct/union/enum tag names and a namespace of typedef names.
name.c
$ cat name.c
#include<stdio.h>
typedef long long long2;
int long2 () {
return 4;
}
int main() {
printf("hello, world!");
return 0;
}
$ gcc name.c -o name
name.c:4: error: 'long2' redeclared as different kind of symbol
name.c:3: error: previous declaration of 'long2' was here
$
name2.c
$ cat name2.c
#include<stdio.h>
int four() {
return 4;
}
struct dummy {
int member;
};
int main() {
struct dummy four;
}
$ gcc name2.c -o name2
$
I am trying to understand C namespace conflicts.
In the first case, why is there a conflict? Do functions also belong to the typedef namespace?
In the second case, why is there no conflict at all? The function and the variable both are named four. Why does the compiler allow that? How is &four
supposed to be resolved?
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…