Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
351 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c# - How to write a comment to an XML file when using the XmlSerializer?

I have an object Foo which I serialize to an XML stream.

public class Foo {
  // The application version, NOT the file version!
  public string Version {get;set;}
  public string Name {get;set;}
}

Foo foo = new Foo { Version = "1.0", Name = "Bar" };
XmlSerializer xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(foo.GetType());

This works fast, easy and does everything currently required.

The problem I'm having is that I need to maintain a separate documentation file with some minor remarks. As in the above example, Name is obvious, but Version is the application version and not the data file version as one could expect in this case. And I have many more similar little things I want to clarify with a comment.

I know I can do this if I manually create my XML file using the WriteComment() function, but is there a possible attribute or alternative syntax I can implement so that I can keep using the serializer functionality?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

This is possible using the default infrastructure by making use of properties that return an object of type XmlComment and marking those properties with [XmlAnyElement("SomeUniquePropertyName")].

I.e. if you add a property to Foo like this:

public class Foo
{
    [XmlAnyElement("VersionComment")]
    public XmlComment VersionComment { get { return new XmlDocument().CreateComment("The application version, NOT the file version!"); } set { } }

    public string Version { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }
}

The following XML will be generated:

<Foo>
  <!--The application version, NOT the file version!-->
  <Version>1.0</Version>
  <Name>Bar</Name>
</Foo>

However, the question is asking for more than this, namely some way to look up the comment in a documentation system. The following accomplishes this by using extension methods to look up the documentation based on the reflected comment property name:

public class Foo
{
    [XmlAnyElement("VersionXmlComment")]
    public XmlComment VersionXmlComment { get { return GetType().GetXmlComment(); } set { } }

    [XmlComment("The application version, NOT the file version!")]
    public string Version { get; set; }

    [XmlAnyElement("NameXmlComment")]
    public XmlComment NameXmlComment { get { return GetType().GetXmlComment(); } set { } }

    [XmlComment("The application name, NOT the file name!")]
    public string Name { get; set; }
}

[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property, AllowMultiple = false)]
public class XmlCommentAttribute : Attribute
{
    public XmlCommentAttribute(string value)
    {
        this.Value = value;
    }

    public string Value { get; set; }
}

public static class XmlCommentExtensions
{
    const string XmlCommentPropertyPostfix = "XmlComment";

    static XmlCommentAttribute GetXmlCommentAttribute(this Type type, string memberName)
    {
        var member = type.GetProperty(memberName);
        if (member == null)
            return null;
        var attr = member.GetCustomAttribute<XmlCommentAttribute>();
        return attr;
    }

    public static XmlComment GetXmlComment(this Type type, [CallerMemberName] string memberName = "")
    {
        var attr = GetXmlCommentAttribute(type, memberName);
        if (attr == null)
        {
            if (memberName.EndsWith(XmlCommentPropertyPostfix))
                attr = GetXmlCommentAttribute(type, memberName.Substring(0, memberName.Length - XmlCommentPropertyPostfix.Length));
        }
        if (attr == null || string.IsNullOrEmpty(attr.Value))
            return null;
        return new XmlDocument().CreateComment(attr.Value);
    }
}

For which the following XML is generated:

<Foo>
  <!--The application version, NOT the file version!-->
  <Version>1.0</Version>
  <!--The application name, NOT the file name!-->
  <Name>Bar</Name>
</Foo>

Notes:

  • The extension method XmlCommentExtensions.GetXmlCommentAttribute(this Type type, string memberName) assumes that the comment property will be named xxxXmlComment where xxx is the "real" property. If so, it can automatically determine the real property name by marking the incoming memberName attribute with CallerMemberNameAttribute. This can be overridden manually by passing in the real name.

  • Once the type and member name are known, the extension method looks up the relevant comment by searching for an [XmlComment] attribute applied to the property. This could be replaced with a cached lookup into a separate documentation file.

  • While it is still necessary to add the xxxXmlComment properties for each property that might be commented, this is likely to be less burdensome than implementing IXmlSerializable directly which is quite tricky, can lead to bugs in deserialization, and can require nested serialization of complex child properties.

  • To ensure that each comment precedes its associated element, see Controlling order of serialization in C#.

  • For XmlSerializer to serialize a property it must have both a getter and setter. Thus I gave the comment properties setters that do nothing.

Working .Net fiddle.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...