Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
505 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

algorithm - How to understand the dynamic programming solution in linear partitioning?

I'm struggling to understand the dynamic programming solution to linear partitioning problem. I am reading the The Algorithm Design Manual and the problem is described in section 8.5. I've read the section countless times but I'm just not getting it. I think it's a poor explanation (the what I've read up to now has been much better), but I've not been able to understand the problem well enough to look for an alternative explanation. Links to better explanations welcome!

I've found a page with text similar to the book (maybe from the first edition of the book): The Partition Problem.

First question: In the example in the book the partitions are ordered from smallest to largest. Is this just coincidence? From what I can see the ordering of the elements is not significant to the algorithm.

This is my understanding of the recursion:

Lets use the following sequence and partition it into 4:

{S1...Sn} =  100   150   200   250   300   350   400   450   500
k = 4

Second question: Here's how I think the recursion will begin - have I understood it correctly?

The 1st recursion is:

100   150   200   250   300   350   400   450 | 500 //3 partition to go
100   150   200   250   300   350   400 | 450 | 500 //2 partition to go 
100   150   200   250   300   350 | 400 | 450 | 500 //1 partition to go
100   150   200   250   300 | 350 | 400 | 450 | 500 //done

The 2nd recursion is:

100   150   200   250   300   350   400   450 | 500 //3 partition to go
100   150   200   250   300   350   400 | 450 | 500 //2 partition to go 
100   150   200   250   300   350 | 400 | 450 | 500 //1 partition to go
100   150   200   250 | 300   350 | 400 | 450 | 500 //done

The 3rd recursion is:

100   150   200   250   300   350   400   450 | 500 //3 partition to go
100   150   200   250   300   350   400 | 450 | 500 //2 partition to go 
100   150   200   250   300   350 | 400 | 450 | 500 //1 partition to go
100   150   200 | 250   300   350 | 400 | 450 | 500 //done

The 4th recursion is:

100   150   200   250   300   350   400   450 | 500 //3 partition to go
100   150   200   250   300   350   400 | 450 | 500 //2 partition to go 
100   150   200   250   300   350 | 400 | 450 | 500 //1 partition to go
100   150 | 200   250   300   350 | 400 | 450 | 500 //done

The 5th recursion is:

100   150   200   250   300   350   400   450 | 500 //3 partition to go
100   150   200   250   300   350   400 | 450 | 500 //2 partition to go 
100   150   200   250   300   350 | 400 | 450 | 500 //1 partition to go
100 | 150   200   250   300   350 | 400 | 450 | 500 //done

The 6th recursion is:

100   150   200   250   300   350   400   450 | 500 //3 partition to go
100   150   200   250   300   350   400 | 450 | 500 //2 partition to go 
100   150   200   250   300 | 350   400 | 450 | 500 //1 partition to go
100   150   200   250 | 300 | 350   400 | 450 | 500 //done

The 7th recursion is:

100   150   200   250   300   350   400   450 | 500 //3 partition to go
100   150   200   250   300   350   400 | 450 | 500 //2 partition to go 
100   150   200   250   300 | 350   400 | 450 | 500 //1 partition to go
100   150   200 | 250   300 | 350   400 | 450 | 500 //done

The 8th recursion is:

100   150   200   250   300   350   400   450 | 500 //3 partition to go
100   150   200   250   300   350   400 | 450 | 500 //2 partition to go 
100   150   200   250   300 | 350   400 | 450 | 500 //1 partition to go
100   150 | 200   250   300 | 350   400 | 450 | 500 //done

The 9th recursion is:

100   150   200   250   300   350   400   450 | 500 //3 partition to go
100   150   200   250   300   350   400 | 450 | 500 //2 partition to go 
100   150   200   250   300 | 350   400 | 450 | 500 //1 partition to go
100 | 150   200   250   300 | 350   400 | 450 | 500 //done

etc...

Here's the code as it appears in the book:

partition(int s[], int n, int k)
{
    int m[MAXN+1][MAXK+1];                  /* DP table for values */
    int d[MAXN+1][MAXK+1];                  /* DP table for dividers */ 
    int p[MAXN+1];                          /* prefix sums array */
    int cost;                               /* test split cost */
    int i,j,x;                              /* counters */
    
    p[0] = 0;                               /* construct prefix sums */
    for (i=1; i<=n; i++) p[i]=p[i-1]+s[i];
    
    for (i=1; i<=n; i++) m[i][3] = p[i];    /* initialize boundaries */
    for (j=1; j<=k; j++) m[1][j] = s[1];
    
    
    for (i=2; i<=n; i++)                    /* evaluate main recurrence */
        for (j=2; j<=k; j++) {
            m[i][j] = MAXINT;
            for (x=1; x<=(i-1); x++) {
                cost = max(m[x][j-1], p[i]-p[x]);
                if (m[i][j] > cost) {
                    m[i][j] = cost;
                    d[i][j] = x;
                }
            }
        }

    reconstruct_partition(s,d,n,k);         /* print book partition */
}

Question about the algorithm:

  1. What values are being stored in the m and d?
  2. What does 'cost' mean? Is it simply the total of the elements values within a partition? Or is there some additional more subtle meaning?
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Be aware that there's a small mistake in the explanation of the algorithm in the book, look in the errata for the text "(*) Page 297".

About your questions:

  1. No, the items don't need to be sorted, only contiguous (that is, you can't rearrange them)
  2. I believe the easiest way to visualize the algorithm is by tracing by hand the reconstruct_partition procedure, using the rightmost table in figure 8.8 as a guide
  3. In the book it states that m[i][j] is "the minimum possible cost over all partitionings of {s1, s2, ... , si}" into j ranges, where the cost of a partition is the larges sum of elements in one of its parts". In other words, it's the "smallest maximum of sums", if you pardon the abuse of terminology. On the other hand, d[i][j] stores the index position which was used to make a partition for a given pair i,j as defined before
  4. For the meaning of "cost", see the previous answer

Edit:

Here's my implementation of the linear partitioning algorithm. It's based on Skiena's algorithm, but in a pythonic way; and it returns a list of the partitions.

from operator import itemgetter

def linear_partition(seq, k):
    if k <= 0:
        return []
    n = len(seq) - 1
    if k > n:
        return map(lambda x: [x], seq)
    table, solution = linear_partition_table(seq, k)
    k, ans = k-2, []
    while k >= 0:
        ans = [[seq[i] for i in xrange(solution[n-1][k]+1, n+1)]] + ans
        n, k = solution[n-1][k], k-1
    return [[seq[i] for i in xrange(0, n+1)]] + ans

def linear_partition_table(seq, k):
    n = len(seq)
    table = [[0] * k for x in xrange(n)]
    solution = [[0] * (k-1) for x in xrange(n-1)]
    for i in xrange(n):
        table[i][0] = seq[i] + (table[i-1][0] if i else 0)
    for j in xrange(k):
        table[0][j] = seq[0]
    for i in xrange(1, n):
        for j in xrange(1, k):
            table[i][j], solution[i-1][j-1] = min(
                ((max(table[x][j-1], table[i][0]-table[x][0]), x) for x in xrange(i)),
                key=itemgetter(0))
    return (table, solution)

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...