You should absolutely use isEmpty()
. Computing the size()
of an arbitrary list could be expensive. Even validating whether it has any elements can be expensive, of course, but there's no optimization for size()
which can't also make isEmpty()
faster, whereas the reverse is not the case.
For example, suppose you had a linked list structure which didn't cache the size (whereas LinkedList<E>
does). Then size()
would become an O(N) operation, whereas isEmpty()
would still be O(1)
.
Additionally of course, using isEmpty()
states what you're actually interested in more clearly.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…