Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
639 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

scala - Can't prove that singleton types are singleton types while generating type class instance

Suppose I've got a type class that proves that all the types in a Shapeless coproduct are singleton types:

import shapeless._

trait AllSingletons[A, C <: Coproduct] {
  def values: List[A]
}

object AllSingletons {
  implicit def cnilSingletons[A]: AllSingletons[A, CNil] =
    new AllSingletons[A, CNil] {
      def values = Nil
    }

  implicit def coproductSingletons[A, H <: A, T <: Coproduct](implicit
    tsc: AllSingletons[A, T],
    witness: Witness.Aux[H]
  ): AllSingletons[A, H :+: T] =
    new AllSingletons[A, H :+: T] {
      def values = witness.value :: tsc.values
    }
}

We can show that it works with a simple ADT:

sealed trait Foo
case object Bar extends Foo
case object Baz extends Foo

And then:

scala> implicitly[AllSingletons[Foo, Bar.type :+: Baz.type :+: CNil]].values
res0: List[Foo] = List(Bar, Baz)

Now we want to combine this with Shapeless's Generic mechanism that'll give us a coproduct representation of our ADT:

trait EnumerableAdt[A] {
  def values: Set[A]
}

object EnumerableAdt {
  implicit def fromAllSingletons[A, C <: Coproduct](implicit
    gen: Generic.Aux[A, C],
    singletons: AllSingletons[A, C]
  ): EnumerableAdt[A] =
    new EnumerableAdt[A] {
      def values = singletons.values.toSet
    }
}

I'd expect implicitly[EnumerableAdt[Foo]] to work, but it doesn't. We can use -Xlog-implicits to get some information about why:

<console>:17: shapeless.this.Witness.apply is not a valid implicit value for
  shapeless.Witness.Aux[Baz.type] because:
Type argument Baz.type is not a singleton type
              implicitly[EnumerableAdt[Foo]]
                        ^
<console>:17: this.AllSingletons.coproductSingletons is not a valid implicit
  value for AllSingletons[Foo,shapeless.:+:[Baz.type,shapeless.CNil]] because:
hasMatchingSymbol reported error: could not find implicit value for parameter
  witness: shapeless.Witness.Aux[Baz.type]
              implicitly[EnumerableAdt[Foo]]
                        ^
<console>:17: this.AllSingletons.coproductSingletons is not a valid implicit
  value for AllSingletons[Foo,this.Repr] because:
hasMatchingSymbol reported error: could not find implicit value for parameter
  tsc: AllSingletons[Foo,shapeless.:+:[Baz.type,shapeless.CNil]]
              implicitly[EnumerableAdt[Foo]]
                        ^
<console>:17: this.EnumerableAdt.fromAllSingletons is not a valid implicit
  value for EnumerableAdt[Foo] because:
hasMatchingSymbol reported error: could not find implicit value for parameter
  singletons: AllSingletons[Foo,C]
              implicitly[EnumerableAdt[Foo]]
                        ^
<console>:17: error: could not find implicit value for parameter e:
  EnumerableAdt[Foo]
              implicitly[EnumerableAdt[Foo]]
                        ^

Baz.type obviously is a singleton type, though. We can try putting the Witness instances in scope manually just for fun:

implicit val barSingleton = Witness[Bar.type]
implicit val bazSingleton = Witness[Baz.type]

And somehow now it works:

scala> implicitly[EnumerableAdt[Foo]].values
res1: Set[Foo] = Set(Bar, Baz)

I don't understand why these instances would work in this context while the ones generated by the Witness.apply macro method (which we used to create them) don't. What's going on here? Is there a convenient workaround that doesn't require us to enumerate the constructors manually?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

This works as written as of the most recent shapeless 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...