TL;DR: some
is one or more, many
is 0 or more results collected from performing the same computation over and over by the familiar maximal munch rule. For this to make sense, some state passing (and alteration) must take place reducing the domain of possibilities somehow, otherwise it will repeat ad infinitum. And state passing and parsing are closely related.
An elementary example instance: with
import Control.Monad(Functor(..))
import Control.Applicative
import Data.Char
-- char string parser
newtype P a = P { runP :: String -> [(a,String)] }
-- runP (P p) s = p s
instance Functor P where
-- fmap :: (a -> b) -> f a -> f b
fmap f (P q) = P (s -> [ (f y,ys) | (y,ys) <- q s])
instance Applicative P where
-- pure :: a -> f a
pure x = P (s -> [(x,s)])
-- (<*>) :: f (a -> b) -> f a -> f b
P p <*> P q = P (s -> [(x y, ys) | (x,xs) <- p s, (y,ys) <- q xs])
letter = P p where -- sample parser
p (x:xs) | isAlpha x = [(x,xs)]
p _ = []
we have
*Main Data.Char> runP letter "123"
[]
*Main Data.Char> runP letter "a123"
[('a',"123")]
*Main Data.Char> runP ( (:) <$> letter <*> pure []) "a123"
[("a","123")]
*Main Data.Char> runP ( (:) <$> letter <*> ((:)<$>letter <*> pure []) ) "a123"
[]
*Main Data.Char> runP ( (:) <$> letter <*> ((:)<$>letter <*> pure []) ) "ab123"
[("ab","123")] -- NOT NICE ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -}
Then, with
instance Alternative P where
-- (<|>) :: f a -> f a -> f a
P p <|> P q = P (s-> p s ++ q s)
-- empty :: f a -- the identity of <|>
empty = P (s-> [])
we get
*Main Data.Char> runP (many letter) "ab123"
[("ab","123"),("a","b123"),("","ab123")]
*Main Data.Char> runP (some letter) "ab123"
[("ab","123"),("a","b123")]
*Main Data.Char> runP (optional letter) "ab123"
[(Just 'a',"b123"),(Nothing,"ab123")]
*Main Data.Char> runP (optional letter) "123"
[(Nothing,"123")]
Prelude Main Data.Traversable> runP (sequenceA $ replicate 2 letter) "ab123"
[("ab","123")] -- NICE ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-}
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…