flex-basis
allows you to specify the initial/starting size of the element, before anything else is computed. It can either be a percentage or an absolute value.
It is, however, not the breaking point for flex-grow/shrink properties. The browser determines when to wrap the element on the basis of if the initial sizes of elements exceed the width of the cross-axis (in conventional sense, that is the width).
Based on your fiddle, the reason why the last one moves down the window is because the width of the parent has been fully occupied by the previous siblings — and when you allow content to wrap, the elements that fail to fit in the first row gets pushed to the subsequent row. Since flex-grow
is a non-zero value, it will simply stretch to fill all spaces left in the second row.
See demo fiddle (modified from yours).
If you look at the fiddle, I have modified for the last item to have a new size declaration:
.size3 {
flex: 0 1 300px;
}
You will realize that the element measures 300px across as intended. However, when you tweak the flex-grow property such that its value exceeds 0 (see example), it will stretch to fill the row, which is the expected behavior. Since in its new row context it has no siblings to compare to, an integer between 1 to infinity will not influence it's size.
Therefore, flex-grow
can be seen as this:
0
: (Default value) Do not stretch. Either size to element's content width, or obey flex-basis
.
1
: Stretch.
≥2
(integer n): Stretch. Will be n times the size of other elements with flex-grow: 1
on the same row, for example.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…