Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
370 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

.net - Dapper and SQL Injections

How does Dapper help protect against SQL injections? I am testing out different DAL technologies and have to choose one to be secure our site. I'm leaning towards Dapper (http://code.google.com/p/dapper-dot-net/), but need some help learning about security.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

How does Dapper help protect against SQL injections?

It makes it really, really easy to do fully parameterized data access, without ever needing to either concatenate input. In particular, because you don't need to jump through lots of "add parameter, set the parameter type, check for null because ADO.NET has sucky null-handling, rinse/repeat for 20 parameters", by making parameter handling stupidly convenient. It also makes turning rows into objects really easy, avoiding the temptation to use DataTable... everyone wins.

From comments:

One more...what does dapper actually help do then?

To answer, let's take the example from marc_s's reply, and write it the old way, assuming all we have to start with is connection. This is then:

List<Dog> dogs = new List<Dog>();
using(var cmd = connection.CreateCommand()) {
    cmd.CommandText = "select Age = @Age, Id = @Id";
    cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("Age", DBNull.Value);
    cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("Id", guid);
    using(var reader = cmd.ExecuteReader()) {
        while(reader.Read()) {
            int age = reader.ReadInt32("Age");
            int id = reader.ReadInt32("Id");
            dogs.Add(new Dog { Age = age, Id = id });
        }
        while(reader.NextResult()) {}
    }
}

except I've over-simplfied grossly, as it also deals with a wide range of issues such as:

  • null handling of parameters
  • null handling of result columns
  • using the ordinal column indices
  • adapting to structural changes of the underlying table and type
  • data conversion of result columns (between various primitives, strings, enums, etc)
  • special handling of the oh-so-common "in this list" scenario
  • for "execute", special handling of the "apply this separately to a list of inputs"
  • avoiding silly typos
  • reducing code maintenance
  • handling multiple grids
  • handling multiple objects returned horizontally in a single grid
  • working with arbitrary ADO.NET providers (hint: AddWithValue rarely exists)
    • including specific support for things like Oracle, which needs additional configuration
    • plays nicely with ADO.NET decoratos such as "mini-profiler"
  • inbuilt support for both buffered (suitable for small-to-moderate data; minimises command duration) and non-bufferesd (suitable for large data; minimised memory usage) accesss
  • optimized by people who care about performance and know "quite a bit" about both data-access and meta-programming
  • allows you to use your choice of POCO / DTO / anon-type / whatever for both the parameter and output
  • allows use of either dynamic (for multi-column) or primitives etc (for single column) when the output doesn't warrant generation a POCO / DTO
  • avoid the overhead of complex fully-typed ORMs like EF
  • avoid the overhead of weak-typed layers like DataTable
  • opening and closing connections as-necessary
  • and a vast range of other common gotchas

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...