Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
765 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

swift - Swift3 optionals chaining in IF conditions bug?

This code worked just fine in Swift 2.3 and I don't understand why I have to unwrap TestClass to check if number is bigger than 4. This is whole point of chaining optionals, to save additional call.

Now to make this work, I have to check if testClass != nil (or use implicit unwrap with if let statement) and then check count.

Is this really the only way?

import UIKit

class testClass
{
    var optionalInt:Int?
}

var test:testClass?

if test?.optionalInt > 4
{

}
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

It's not a bug. It is, alas, intentional. Implicit unwrapping of optionals in comparisons (>) has been removed from the language.

So, the problem now is that what's on the left side of the > is an Optional, and you can no longer compare that directly to 4. You have to unwrap it and get an Int, one way or another.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...