Important Update: See update 5 at the bottom there is no performance issue in asp.net mvc 3, this is a benchmark issue
I've made a simple hello world project in asp.net mvc2,3 aspx and 3 razor and benchmarked them. What I see is:
System Requests per second
-------------------------------------------
asp.net mvc 2 ASPX 4200
asp.net mvc 3 Beta 1 ASPX 3200
asp.net mvc 3 Beta 1 Razor 1700
What's wrong with razor, it's so slow?
Update:
I've redone the test. All 4 test virtual directories uses the same .net 4 integrated mode app pool. All projects are done with add new empty x project and adding 1 page with 1 line text and with no code. all sites are compiled in release mode. My system is windows 7, 4 gb i7 4 cores. I've run the test 2 times to warm up iis and these are second run results. apache bench parameters : ab -n100000 -c1000
results:
System Requests per second CPU Utilization
----------------------------------------------------
asp.net 4 4780 43%
mcv 2 4322 58%
mvc 3 beta 1 aspx 2324 54%
mvc 3 beta 1 razor 1615 54%
Update 2 Scott Guthrie answered in his blog:
We haven't fully optimized MVC3 yet (there is usually a lot of cache tuning we do). We expect razor to be the same performance as the .aspx view engine before it is finally released.
System Requests per second CPU Utilization
----------------------------------------------------
mvc 3 rc1 razor 1960 54%
mvc 3 rc2 razor 2187 54%
mvc 3 rc2 aspx 4014 58%
Update 5 all tests done in release mode but, the problem was debug="true"
in my web.config file (that also effects release builds), after change it to false, issue fixed. And it's interesting how it's effecting only razor templating at this scale. This should be in our mind on deployments.
System Requests per second CPU Utilization
----------------------------------------------------
mvc 3 rc2 razor 3940 58%
mvc 3 rc2 aspx 4100 58%
Thanks to asp.net mvc team, excellent job!
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…