Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
733 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

database - Picking the best primary key + numbering system

We are trying to come up with a numbering system for the asset system that we are creating, there has been a few heated discussions on this topic in the office so I decided to ask the experts of SO.

Considering the database design below what would be the better option.

alt text

Example 1: Using auto surrogate keys.

=================   ==================
Road_Number(PK)     Segment_Number(PK)
=================   ==================
 1                   1

Example 2: Using program generated PK

=================   ==================
Road_Number(PK)     Segment_Number(PK)
=================   ==================
 "RD00000001WCK"     "00000001.1"

(the 00000001.1 means it's the first segment of the road. This increases everytime you add a new segment e.g. 00000001.2)

Example 3: Using a bit of both(adding a new column)

=======================    ==========================
ID(PK) Road_Number(UK)     ID(PK)  Segment_Number(UK)
=======================    ==========================
 1     "RD00000001WCK"       1       "00000001.1"

Just a bit of background information, we will be using the Road Number and Segment Number in reports and other documents, so they have to be unique.

I have always liked keeping things simple so I prefer example 1, but I have been reading that you should not expose your primary keys in reports/documents. So now I'm thinking more along the lines of example 3.

I am also leaning towards example 3 because if we decide to change how our asset numbering is generated it won't have to do cascade updates on a primary key.

What do you think we should do?

Thanks.

EDIT: Thanks everyone for the great answers, has help me a lot.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

This is really a discussion about surrogate (also called technical or synthetic) vs natural primary keys, a subject that has been extensively covered. I covered this in Database Development Mistakes Made by AppDevelopers.

Natural keys are keys based on externally meaningful data that is (ostensibly) unique. Common examples are product codes, two-letter state codes (US), social security numbers and so on. Surrogate or technical primary keys are those that have absolutely no meaning outside the system. They are invented purely for identifying the entity and are typically auto-incrementing fields (SQL Server, MySQL, others) or sequences (most notably Oracle).

In my opinion you should always use surrogate keys. This issue has come up in these questions:

Auto number fields are the way to go. If your keys have meaning outside your database (like asset numbers) those will quite possibly change and changing keys is problematic. Just use indexes for those things into the relevant tables.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...