maven - Where should I put unit tests when migrating a Java 8 project to Jigsaw

Question

I am currently testing to migrate a Java 8 application to Java 9 / Jigsaw, using jdk-9+149.

The project has been laid out in standard Maven directory layout, i.e. having src/main/java, src/test/java, etc.

As soon as I add the module-info.java to src/main/java, maven-compiler-plugin fails throwing a NullPointerException. This is because it expects to find a module-info for the test directory, too. So, as far as I can see, the options are:

• keep test classes in a separate module, which means they can only access exported packages of the main module.
• move test classes into the main module, together with the sources, which means that the main module needs test dependencies.

Obviously, neither of those options seems to be desirable, so I assume there is a recommended way of testing Jigsaw modules in a Maven project. Unfornately, I could neither find recommendations nor examples.

EDIT: Adding some information that I didn't regard relevant when posting the question (sorry)

• the NullPointerException I ran into
• Maven 3.3.9
• maven-compiler-plugin 3.6.0
• source and target config: 9

Answer 1

Maven support for Java 9 in general and tests in particular is still under development - many things work but others might not. Without seeing the stack trace for the NPE, it is of course speculation, but I assume you ran into this error.

More generally, the question of how exactly unit tests will work with Jigsaw is still being discussed - even on the Jigsaw mailing list.

Here's my opinion on the matter:

1. As you note, putting tests into a separate module would mean that only public types in exported packages would be testable, which is definitely not enough. There could be workarounds but those require to either edit the module declaration (source code; module-info.java) or descriptor (byte code, module-info.class) on the fly or add a ton of --add-exports command line flags to the javac and java commands compiling and running the tests. None of these sound particularly fun, especially if you want to do it by hand.

2. Moving tests into the source tree is a bad idea as well for obvious reasons, not least among them that creating a JAR without tests would then require a lot of fiddling.

3. Another option is to use the --patch-module option that allows to add class-files or the content of a JAR to an existing module. This way the testCompile step could create a JAR containing the source and test files. Unfortunately, unless it manipulates the module declaration/description as described above, the resulting JAR can not be executed without adding reads edges with java --add-reads for the test dependencies. Still, better than above.

4. As a kind of last resort, there are ways to have the production JAR be treated like a regular JAR instead of as a module. The easiest would probably be to dump it on the class path together with the test JAR. This way everything works as in Java <9. Unfortunately this will break code that uses features under the assumption that it is inside a named module (e.g. certain kinds of interactions with the reflection API).

Personally, I consider 3. to be the best of the above options. It would require no changes in project layout and only comparatively minor additions to javac and java commands.