Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
361 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

r - Harnessing .f list names with purrr::pmap

The following works ok:

pmap_dbl(iris, ~ ..1 + ..2 + ..3 + ..4)

The documentation for .l provides for A list of lists. ... List names will be used if present.. This suggests you should be able to work with the list names (i.e. column names). However:

pmap_dbl(iris, ~ Sepal.Length + Sepal.Width + Petal.Length + Petal.Width)
Error in .f(Sepal.Length = .l[[c(1L, i)]], Sepal.Width = .l[[c(2L, i)]],  : 
  object 'Sepal.Length' not found

How are list names harnessed in practice?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

The formula argument ~ Sepal.Length + Sepal.Width + Petal.Length + Petal.Width is passed to purrr::as_mapper.

purrr::as_mapper(~ Sepal.Length + Sepal.Width + Petal.Length + Petal.Width)
# function (..., .x = ..1, .y = ..2, . = ..1) 
# Sepal.Length + Sepal.Width + Petal.Length + Petal.Width

You can see that there's no direct way for this function to know what these variables are.

I can think of 3 ways around this. I'll use @zacdav's example as it's more compact and readable than yours:

named_list <- list(one = c(1, 1),
                   two = c(2, 2),
                   three = c(3, 3))

Explicit definition

You can define explicitly these variables as shown in @zacdav's answer it will work.


Explore the dots argument

There is a way to access the named arguments through the ... parameter of the function returned by as_mapper.

The arguments of the function are named when names are available, as the doc states in other words.

That explains why pmap(named_list, function(x,y,z) x+y+z) will fail with error:

unused arguments (one = .l[[c(1, i)]], two = .l[[c(2, i)]], three = .l[[c(3, i)]])

See:

pmap(named_list, ~names(list(...)))
# [[1]]
# [1] "one"   "two"   "three"
# 
# [[2]]
# [1] "one"   "two"   "three"

(pmap(unname(named_list), function(x,y,z) x+y+z) on the other hand will work fine)

So this will work:

pmap(named_list, ~ with(list(...), one + two + three))
# [[1]]
# [1] 6
# 
# [[2]]
# [1] 6 

Use pryr::f

pryr offers a neat shortcut for function definitions with pryr::f :

library(pryr)
f(one + two + three)
# function (one, three, two) 
# one + two + three

pmap(named_list, f(one + two + three))
# [[1]]
# [1] 6
# 
# [[2]]
# [1] 6
# 

Be careful however when using it, global variables will still show up as parameters and functions will or will not be included in parameters depending on how they're called. For example :

x <- 1
test <- mean
f(test(x) + lapply(iris,test2))
# function (iris, test2, x) 
# test(x) + lapply(iris, test2)

So it's not a general approach and you should use it only with simple cases. the second approach, though a bit of a hack, will be general.

Moreover f is ordering the parameters alphabetically, this should not be an issue when dealing with a named list, but be careful when dealing with partially named lists.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...