Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
219 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

android - Why does AndroidTestCase.getContext().getApplicationContext() return null?

UPDATE 2/13/2012: Accepted an answer, explained that this behavior is a bug, and noted that it appears to have disappeared on emulators better than v 1.6, which makes it a non-issue for most of us. The workaround is simply to loop/sleep until getContext().getApplicationContext() returns non-null. END UPDATE

As per android.app.Application javadoc, I defined a singleton (called Database) that all of my activities access for state and persistent data, and Database.getDatabase(Context) gets the application context via Context.getApplicationContext(). This setup works as advertised when activities pass themselves to getDatabase(Context), but when I run a unit test from an AndroidTestCase, the getApplicationContext() call often returns null, though the longer the test, the more frequently it returns a non-null value.

The following code reproduces the null within an AndroidTestCase -- the singleton isn't necessary for the demonstration.

First, to log app-instantiation messages, in the app-under-test I defined MyApp and added it to the manifest.

public class MyApplication extends Application {
    @Override
    public void onCreate() {
        super.onCreate();
        Log.i("MYAPP", "this=" + this);
        Log.i("MYAPP", "getAppCtx()=" + getApplicationContext());
    }
}

Next, I defined a test case to report on AndroidTestCase.getContext() 4 times, separated by some sleeps and a getSharedPreferences() call:

public class DatabaseTest extends AndroidTestCase {
    public void test_exploreContext() {
        exploreContexts("XPLORE1");
        getContext().getSharedPreferences("foo", Context.MODE_PRIVATE);
        exploreContexts("XPLORE2");
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            // TODO Auto-generated catch block
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        exploreContexts("XPLORE3");
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            // TODO Auto-generated catch block
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        exploreContexts("XPLORE4");
    }
    public void exploreContexts(String tag) {
        Context testContext = getContext();
        Log.i(tag, "testCtx=" + testContext + 
                " pkg=" + testContext.getApplicationInfo().packageName);
        Log.i(tag, "testContext.getAppCtx()=" + testContext.getApplicationContext());
        try {
            Context appContext = testContext.createPackageContext("com.foo.android", 0);
            ApplicationInfo appInfo = appContext.getApplicationInfo();
            Log.i(tag, "appContext=" + appContext +
                    " pkg=" + appContext.getApplicationInfo().packageName);
            Log.i(tag, "appContext.getAppCtx()=" + appContext.getApplicationContext());
        } catch (NameNotFoundException e) {
            Log.i(tag, "Can't get app context.");
        }
    }
}

And this is a chunk of the resulting logCat (1.6 emulator on SDK11 WinXP via Eclipse):

INFO/TestRunner(465): started: test_exploreContext(test.foo.android.DatabaseTest)
INFO/XPLORE1(465): testCtx=android.app.ApplicationContext@43757368 pkg=com.foo.android
INFO/XPLORE1(465): testContext.getAppCtx()=null
INFO/XPLORE1(465): appContext=android.app.ApplicationContext@437801e8 pkg=com.foo.android
INFO/XPLORE1(465): appContext.getAppCtx()=null
INFO/XPLORE2(465): testCtx=android.app.ApplicationContext@43757368 pkg=com.foo.android
INFO/XPLORE2(465): testContext.getAppCtx()=null
INFO/XPLORE2(465): appContext=android.app.ApplicationContext@43782820 pkg=com.foo.android
INFO/XPLORE2(465): appContext.getAppCtx()=null
INFO/MYAPP(465): this=com.foo.android.MyApplication@43783830
INFO/MYAPP(465): getAppCtx()=com.foo.android.MyApplication@43783830
INFO/XPLORE3(465): testCtx=android.app.ApplicationContext@43757368 pkg=com.foo.android
INFO/XPLORE3(465): testContext.getAppCtx()=com.foo.android.MyApplication@43783830
INFO/XPLORE3(465): appContext=android.app.ApplicationContext@43784768 pkg=com.foo.android
INFO/XPLORE3(465): appContext.getAppCtx()=com.foo.android.MyApplication@43783830
INFO/XPLORE4(465): testCtx=android.app.ApplicationContext@43757368 pkg=com.foo.android
INFO/XPLORE4(465): testContext.getAppCtx()=com.foo.android.MyApplication@43783830
INFO/XPLORE4(465): appContext=android.app.ApplicationContext@43785778 pkg=com.foo.android
INFO/XPLORE4(465): appContext.getAppCtx()=com.foo.android.MyApplication@43783830
INFO/TestRunner(465): finished: test_exploreContext(test.foo.android.DatabaseTest)

Notice that getApplicationContext() returned null for a while, then started returning an instance of MyApp. I have not been able to get the exact same results in different runs of this test (that's how I ended up at 4 iterations, sleeps, and that call to getSharedPreferences() to try to goose the app into existence).

The chunk of LogCat messages above seemed most relevant, but the entire LogCat for that single run of that single test was interesting. Android started 4 AndroidRuntimes; the chunk above was from the 4th. Interestingly, the 3rd runtime displayed messages indicating that it instantiated a different instance of MyApp in process ID 447:

INFO/TestRunner(447): started: test_exploreContext(test.foo.android.DatabaseTest)
INFO/MYAPP(447): this=com.foo.android.MyApplication@437809b0
INFO/MYAPP(447): getAppCtx()=com.foo.android.MyApplication@437809b0
INFO/TestRunner(447): finished: test_exploreContext(test.foo.android.DatabaseTest)

I assume that the TestRunner(447) messages are from a parent test thread reporting on its children in process 465. Still, the question is: why does Android let an AndroidTestCase run before its context is properly hooked up to an Application instance?

Workaround: One of my tests seemed to avoid nulls most of the time if I called getContext().getSharedPreferences("anyname", Context.MODE_PRIVATE).edit().clear().commit(); first, so I'm going with that.

BTW: If the answer is "it's an Android bug, why don't you file it; heck, why don't you fix it?" then I'd be willing to do both. I haven't taken the step of being a bug-filer or contributor yet -- maybe this is a good time.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Instrumentation runs in a separate thread from the main app thread, so that it can execute without blocking or disrupting (or being blocked by) the main thread. If you need to synchronize with the main thread, use for example: Instrumentation.waitForIdleSync()

In particular, the Application object as well as all other top-level classes like Activity are initialized by the main thread. Your instrumentation thread is running at the same time those are initializing. This if you are touching any of those objects and are not implementing your own measures of thread safety, you should probably have such code run on the main thread such as via: Instrumentation.runOnMainSync(java.lang.Runnable)


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...