I ran into a problem where Z3Py does not enumerate all possible solutions for the given Boolean clauses. I was wondering if anyone knows why this is happening.
Here is the code I use for the Z3Py. There are 5 booleans: 1 2 3 4 and 5.
from z3 import *
a,b,c,d,e = Bools('1 2 3 4 5')
solver = Solver()
solver.add(Or(Not(a), Not(b)))
solver.add(Or(Not(b), Not(c)))
solver.add(Or(Not(c), Not(d)))
solver.add(Or(Not(d), Not(e)))
while solver.check() == sat:
model = solver.model()
block = []
for declaration in model:
constant = declaration()
block.append(constant != model[declaration])
solver.append(Or(block))
solution = []
for val in model:
if is_true(model[val]):
solution.append(str(val()))
else:
solution.append('-' + str(val()))
solution.sort()
print(solution)
This produces the following models:
['-1', '-2', '-3', '-4', '-5']
['-2', '-3', '-5', '1']
['-2', '-3', '-4', '1', '5']
['-2', '-4', '3', '5']
['-2', '-4', '-5', '3']
['-1', '-3', '-4', '-5', '2']
['-1', '-3', '-4', '2', '5']
['-1', '-2', '-3', '-4', '5']
['-1', '-2', '-3', '-5', '4']
['-1', '-3', '-5', '2', '4']
If I run the same clauses using Pycosat with the following code:
import pycosat
clauses = [(-1, -2), (-2, -3), (-3, -4), (-4, -5)]
for solution in pycosat.itersolve(clauses):
print(solution)
I get those results:
[-1, -2, -3, -4, -5]
[-1, -2, -3, -4, 5]
[-1, -2, -3, 4, -5]
[-1, -2, 3, -4, -5]
[-1, -2, 3, -4, 5]
[-1, 2, -3, -4, -5]
[-1, 2, -3, -4, 5]
[-1, 2, -3, 4, -5]
[1, -2, -3, 4, -5]
[1, -2, -3, -4, -5]
[1, -2, -3, -4, 5]
[1, -2, 3, -4, -5]
[1, -2, 3, -4, 5]
Hence, Z3Py missing out 3 possible solutions based on the results from Pycosat. And those are:
[1, -2, 3, -4, 5]
[1, -2, -3, 4, -5]
[1, -2, 3, -4, -5]
I know those are the different solvers but based on the same clauses used for both of them, I would expect the results to match. Anyone knows why Z3Py would miss out those solutions in this case?
The other thing is that not all the solutions in Z3Py contain all the defined variables.
See Question&Answers more detail:
os