Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
616 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

multithreading - C# High CPU usage on Listener thread, sleeping misses disconnect

My connection handler is below (this is more for personal experimentation than production code)

If I don't add a Thread.Sleep anywhere in the while loop, it starts sucking down CPU.. Conversely, if I do Sleep to alleviate the endless while-spam, I miss the disconnection.. The CPU goes up in direct proportion to the number of clients/threads running, so it's not the listener itself that's causing the high usage, it's the actual client thread posted below.. Anyone have any ideas on how to solve this?

(I'm avoiding await-based solutions as I'm not familiar enough with async/await and the threaded method is working fine for this rather small project)

I only briefly searched around SO looking for a solution and didn't notice any that were this specific problem or that provided a solution other than directing folks to async/await articles, so sorry if I did miss an applicable answer.

        private void HandleConnection(CancellationToken ct) {
        int recv = 0;
        byte[] buf = new byte[4096];
        Trace.WriteLine($"{_name} Connected");
        if (_ns.CanWrite && _client.Connected) {
            _ns.Write(Encoding.BigEndianUnicode.GetBytes("■WEL"), 0, Encoding.BigEndianUnicode.GetBytes("■WEL").Length);
            try {
                while (_client.Connected && !ct.IsCancellationRequested) {

                    while (!_ns.DataAvailable) { //first attempted solution
                        Thread.Sleep(100); // miss discon if i sleep here
                        }

                    if (ct.IsCancellationRequested) {
                        Trace.WriteLine($"{(string)this} thread aborting");
                        break;
                        }

                    buf = new byte[4096];

                    if (_client.Connected && _ns.DataAvailable) {

                        recv = _ns.Read(buf, 0, buf.Length);
                        } else {
                        recv = 0;
                        }

                    if (recv > 0) {

                        string r = Encoding.BigEndianUnicode.GetString(buf);
                        r = r.TrimEnd('');
                        if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(r) || String.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(r))
                            r = null; //need the !not version
                        else
                            if (ParseMsg(r))
                                break;
                        }

                    //Thread.Sleep(100); // also miss discon here too

                    }
                } catch (IOException ioe) { }
            Trace.WriteLine($"{_name} Disconnected");
            if (OnDisconnected != null)
                OnDisconnected(this);
            }
        }
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

The proper way to communicate over a socket is:

  1. Continuously read. These reads will block until data comes in or until the socket is gracefully disconnected (detectable by a read completing with 0 bytes read).
  2. Periodically write. These writes are required to ensure the connection is still viable.

A proper threading approach requires two threads per connection. I'm not convinced that it's simpler than an asynchronous approach.

P.S. If your code uses Connected, then it has a bug. Proper solutions never need to use Connected.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...