std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock> now = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
This is a great place for auto
:
auto now = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
Since you want to traffic at millisecond
precision, it would be good to go ahead and covert to it in the time_point
:
auto now_ms = std::chrono::time_point_cast<std::chrono::milliseconds>(now);
now_ms
is a time_point
, based on system_clock
, but with the precision of milliseconds
instead of whatever precision your system_clock
has.
auto epoch = now_ms.time_since_epoch();
epoch
now has type std::chrono::milliseconds
. And this next statement becomes essentially a no-op (simply makes a copy and does not make a conversion):
auto value = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::milliseconds>(epoch);
Here:
long duration = value.count();
In both your and my code, duration
holds the number of milliseconds
since the epoch of system_clock
.
This:
std::chrono::duration<long> dur(duration);
Creates a duration
represented with a long
, and a precision of seconds
. This effectively reinterpret_cast
s the milliseconds
held in value
to seconds
. It is a logic error. The correct code would look like:
std::chrono::milliseconds dur(duration);
This line:
std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock> dt(dur);
creates a time_point
based on system_clock
, with the capability of holding a precision to the system_clock
's native precision (typically finer than milliseconds). However the run-time value will correctly reflect that an integral number of milliseconds are held (assuming my correction on the type of dur
).
Even with the correction, this test will (nearly always) fail though:
if (dt != now)
Because dt
holds an integral number of milliseconds
, but now
holds an integral number of ticks finer than a millisecond
(e.g. microseconds
or nanoseconds
). Thus only on the rare chance that system_clock::now()
returned an integral number of milliseconds
would the test pass.
But you can instead:
if (dt != now_ms)
And you will now get your expected result reliably.
Putting it all together:
int main ()
{
auto now = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
auto now_ms = std::chrono::time_point_cast<std::chrono::milliseconds>(now);
auto value = now_ms.time_since_epoch();
long duration = value.count();
std::chrono::milliseconds dur(duration);
std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock> dt(dur);
if (dt != now_ms)
std::cout << "Failure." << std::endl;
else
std::cout << "Success." << std::endl;
}
Personally I find all the std::chrono
overly verbose and so I would code it as:
int main ()
{
using namespace std::chrono;
auto now = system_clock::now();
auto now_ms = time_point_cast<milliseconds>(now);
auto value = now_ms.time_since_epoch();
long duration = value.count();
milliseconds dur(duration);
time_point<system_clock> dt(dur);
if (dt != now_ms)
std::cout << "Failure." << std::endl;
else
std::cout << "Success." << std::endl;
}
Which will reliably output:
Success.
Finally, I recommend eliminating temporaries to reduce the code converting between time_point
and integral type to a minimum. These conversions are dangerous, and so the less code you write manipulating the bare integral type the better:
int main ()
{
using namespace std::chrono;
// Get current time with precision of milliseconds
auto now = time_point_cast<milliseconds>(system_clock::now());
// sys_milliseconds is type time_point<system_clock, milliseconds>
using sys_milliseconds = decltype(now);
// Convert time_point to signed integral type
auto integral_duration = now.time_since_epoch().count();
// Convert signed integral type to time_point
sys_milliseconds dt{milliseconds{integral_duration}};
// test
if (dt != now)
std::cout << "Failure." << std::endl;
else
std::cout << "Success." << std::endl;
}
The main danger above is not interpreting integral_duration
as milliseconds
on the way back to a time_point
. One possible way to mitigate that risk is to write:
sys_milliseconds dt{sys_milliseconds::duration{integral_duration}};
This reduces risk down to just making sure you use sys_milliseconds
on the way out, and in the two places on the way back in.
And one more example: Let's say you want to convert to and from an integral which represents whatever duration system_clock
supports (microseconds, 10th of microseconds or nanoseconds). Then you don't have to worry about specifying milliseconds as above. The code simplifies to:
int main ()
{
using namespace std::chrono;
// Get current time with native precision
auto now = system_clock::now();
// Convert time_point to signed integral type
auto integral_duration = now.time_since_epoch().count();
// Convert signed integral type to time_point
system_clock::time_point dt{system_clock::duration{integral_duration}};
// test
if (dt != now)
std::cout << "Failure." << std::endl;
else
std::cout << "Success." << std::endl;
}
This works, but if you run half the conversion (out to integral) on one platform and the other half (in from integral) on another platform, you run the risk that system_clock::duration
will have different precisions for the two conversions.