Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
576 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

git stash is slow on windows

On my windows machine git stash has about 3.5 seconds overhead on each invocation, which adds about 7 seconds to my git commit hook.

The same command under linux (same machine) takes about 0.01 seconds. The performance issue applies to empty repositories as well.

I have tried the following from this thread and this thread:

  • core.fscache is set to true
  • core.preloadindex is set to true
  • gc.auto is set to 256
  • Setting PS1='$ '
  • Running cmd in administration mode
  • Running inside cmd.exe instead of git-bash

Running GIT_TRACE=true git stash list

16:58:16.844591 git.c:563               trace: exec: 'git-stash' 'list'
16:58:16.844591 run-command.c:336       trace: run_command: 'git-stash' 'list'
16:58:19.699591 git.c:350               trace: built-in: git 'rev-parse' '--git-dir'
16:58:19.859591 git.c:350               trace: built-in: git 'rev-parse' '--git-path' 'objects'
16:58:20.069591 git.c:350               trace: built-in: git 'rev-parse' '--show-toplevel'
16:58:20.154591 git.c:350               trace: built-in: git 'rev-parse' '--git-path' 'index'
16:58:20.244591 git.c:350               trace: built-in: git 'config' '--get-colorbool' 'color.interactive'
16:58:20.334591 git.c:350               trace: built-in: git 'config' '--get-color' 'color.interactive.help' 'red bold'
16:58:20.424591 git.c:350               trace: built-in: git 'config' '--get-color' '' 'reset'
16:58:20.514591 git.c:350               trace: built-in: git 'rev-parse' '--verify' '--quiet' 'refs/stash'

real    0m3.845s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.047s

Running GIT_TRACE_PERFORMANCE=true git stash list

16:59:18.414591 trace.c:420             performance: 0.001078046 s: git command: 'C:Program FilesGitmingw64libexecgit-coregit.exe' 'rev-parse' '--git-dir'                                          
16:59:18.569591 trace.c:420             performance: 0.000947184 s: git command: 'C:Program FilesGitmingw64libexecgit-coregit.exe' 'rev-parse' '--git-path' 'objects'                               
16:59:18.779591 trace.c:420             performance: 0.001253627 s: git command: 'C:Program FilesGitmingw64libexecgit-coregit.exe' 'rev-parse' '--show-toplevel'                                    
16:59:18.869591 trace.c:420             performance: 0.001285517 s: git command: 'C:Program FilesGitmingw64libexecgit-coregit.exe' 'rev-parse' '--git-path' 'index'                                 
16:59:18.955591 trace.c:420             performance: 0.001139994 s: git command: 'C:Program FilesGitmingw64libexecgit-coregit.exe' 'config' '--get-colorbool' 'color.interactive'                   
16:59:19.040591 trace.c:420             performance: 0.001182881 s: git command: 'C:Program FilesGitmingw64libexecgit-coregit.exe' 'config' '--get-color' 'color.interactive.help' 'red bold'       
16:59:19.125591 trace.c:420             performance: 0.001128997 s: git command: 'C:Program FilesGitmingw64libexecgit-coregit.exe' 'config' '--get-color' '' 'reset'                                
16:59:19.215591 trace.c:420             performance: 0.001567766 s: git command: 'C:Program FilesGitmingw64libexecgit-coregit.exe' 'rev-parse' '--verify' '--quiet' 'refs/stash'                    
16:59:19.295591 trace.c:420             performance: 3.730583540 s: git command: 'C:Program FilesGitmingw64ingit.exe' 'stash' 'list'                                                                

real    0m3.819s                                                                                                                                                                                          
user    0m0.000s                                                                                                                                                                                          
sys     0m0.062s                                                                                                                                                                                          

From the log we see that it takes around 3 seconds between the git-stash command is run and the git-rev-parse is run. Are there any other flags I can run to find the bottleneck?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

With Git for Windows 2.19 (Sept. 2018), git stash (and git rebase) are no longer script-only, but actually a binary compiled with git.exe.
See git-for-windows/build-extra PR 203.

To activate them, type:

git config --global rebase.useBuiltin true
git config --global stash.useBuiltin true

Warning:

As nice as the speed-ups are, the patches in question are still in flux, and they are not battle-tested at all.

So, for now, the script version of git stash remains the default, that way:

  • users who want the raw speed improvement we got through three Google Summer of Code projects working in parallel can have that,
  • while others who are reluctant to play guinea pig by running only well-tested code can stay on the safe side.

The point remains: in the next versions of Git, the bash script for git-stash will eventually disappear, and its replacement is and will be faster.

Note: that next version will be Git 2.27 (Q2 2020): "git stash" has kept an escape hatch to use the scripted version for a few releases, which got stale.

It has been removed.

See commit 8a2cd3f, commit b0c7362 (03 Mar 2020) by Thomas Gummerer (tgummerer).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit 369ae75, 27 Mar 2020)

stash: remove the stash.useBuiltin setting

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer

Remove the stash.useBuiltin setting which was added as an escape hatch to disable the builtin version of stash first released with Git 2.22.

Carrying the legacy version is a maintenance burden, and has in fact become out of date failing a test since the 2.23 release, without anyone noticing until now.

So users would be getting a hint to fall back to a potentially buggy version of the tool.

We used to shell out to git config to get the useBuiltin configuration to avoid changing any global state before spawning legacy-stash.
However that is no longer necessary, so just use the 'git_config' function to get the setting instead.

Similar to what we've done in d03ebd411c ("rebase: remove the rebase.useBuiltin setting", 2019-03-18, Git v2.22.0-rc0 -- merge listed in batch #5), where we remove the corresponding setting for rebase, we leave the documentation in place, so people can refer back to it when searching for it online, and so we can refer to it in the commit message.


Update Q2 2019, with Git 2.22, git stash is entirely rewritten in C. 2 See commit 40af146, commit 48ee24a, commit ef0f0b4, commit 64fe9c2, commit 1ac528c, commit d553f53, commit d4788af, commit 41e0dd5, commit dc7bd38, commit 130f269, commit bef55dc, commit dac566c, commit ab8ad46 (25 Feb 2019) by Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu (weekly-digest[bot]).
See commit c4de61d, commit 577c199, commit 4e2dd39, commit 8a0fc8d (25 Feb 2019) by Joel Teichroeb (klusark).
See commit 7906af0, commit 90a4627, commit 8d8e9c2 (25 Feb 2019) by Johannes Schindelin (dscho).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit e36adf7, 22 Apr 2019)

You can still use the shell script with git legacy-stash.

And:

stash: convert stash--helper.c into stash.c

The old shell script git-stash.sh was removed and replaced entirely by builtin/stash.c.
In order to do that, create and push were adapted to work without stash.sh.

For example, before this commit, git stash create called git stash--helper create --message "$*". If it called git stash--helper create "$@", then some of these changes wouldn't have been necessary.

This commit also removes the word helper since now stash is called directly and not by a shell script.

There are optimizations:

stash: optimize get_untracked_files() and check_changes()

This commits introduces a optimization by avoiding calling the same functions again.
For example, git stash push -u would call at some points the following functions:

  • check_changes() (inside do_push_stash())
  • do_create_stash(), which calls: check_changes() and get_untracked_files()

Note that check_changes() also calls get_untracked_files().
So, check_changes() is called 2 times and get_untracked_files() 3 times.

The old function check_changes() now consists of two functions: get_untracked_files() and check_changes_tracked_files().

These are the call chains for push and create:

  • push_stash() -> do_push_stash() -> do_create_stash()
  • create_stash() -> do_create_stash()

To prevent calling the same functions over and over again, check_changes() inside do_create_stash() is now placed in the caller functions (create_stash() and do_push_stash()).
This way check_changes() and get_untracked files() are called only one time.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...