The median of five is sometimes used as an exercise in algorithm design and is known to be computable using only 6 comparisons.
What is the best way to implement this "median of five using 6 comparisons" in C# ? All of my attempts seem to result in awkward code :( I need nice and readable code while still using only 6 comparisons.
public double medianOfFive(double a, double b, double c, double d, double e){
//
// return median
//
return c;
}
Note: I think I should provide the "algorithm" here too:
I found myself not able to explain the algorithm clearly as Azereal did in his forum post. So I will reference his post here. From http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=riddles_cs;action=display;num=1061827085
Well I was posed this problem in one
of my assignments and I turned to this
forum for help but no help was here.
I eventually found out how to do it.
Start a mergesort with the first 4 elements and order each pair (2
comparisons)
Compare the two lower ones of each pair and eliminate the lowest one from
the possibilities (3 comparisons)
Add in the 5th number set aside to the number without a pair and compare
the two (4 comparisons)
Compare the two lowest of the two new pairs and eliminate the lower one
(5 comparisons)
Compare the one by itself and the lower of the last pair and the lower
number is the median
The possible median is within the
parentesis
(54321)
5:4 3:2 2 comparisons
(4<5 2<3 1)
4:2 3 comparisons
2(4<5 3 1)
1:3 4 comparisons
2(4<5 1<3)
4:1 5 comparisons
1,2(4<5 3)
4:3 6 comparisons
1,2(3)4,5
Three is the median
Here is the C++ code I wrote to find median of five. Don't mind its awkwardness:
double StageGenerator::MedianOfFive(double n1, double n2, double n3, double n4, double n5){
double *a = &n1, *b = &n2, *c = &n3, *d = &n4, *e = &n5;
double *tmp;
// makes a < b and b < d
if(*b < *a){
tmp = a; a = b; b = tmp;
}
if(*d < *c){
tmp = c; c = d; d = tmp;
}
// eleminate the lowest
if(*c < *a){
tmp = b; b = d; d = tmp;
c = a;
}
// gets e in
a = e;
// makes a < b and b < d
if(*b < *a){
tmp = a; a = b; b = tmp;
}
// eliminate another lowest
// remaing: a,b,d
if(*a < *c){
tmp = b; b = d; d = tmp;
a = c;
}
if(*d < *a)
return *d;
else
return *a;
}
It should be more compact, isn't it ?
As @pablito pointed out in his answer, the built-in List.Sort()
cannot fulfill this requirement since it uses up to 13 comparisons :]
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…