Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
1.1k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

python - Pytorch - RuntimeError: Trying to backward through the graph a second time, but the buffers have already been freed

I keep running into this error:

RuntimeError: Trying to backward through the graph a second time, but the buffers have already been freed. Specify retain_graph=True when calling backward the first time.

I had searched in Pytorch forum, but still can’t find out what I have done wrong in my custom loss function. My model is nn.GRU, and here is my custom loss function:

def _loss(outputs, session, items):  # `items` is a dict() contains embedding of all items
    def f(output, target):
        pos = torch.from_numpy(np.array([items[target["click"]]])).float()
        neg = torch.from_numpy(np.array([items[idx] for idx in target["suggest_list"] if idx != target["click"]])).float()
        if USE_CUDA:
            pos, neg = pos.cuda(), neg.cuda()
        pos, neg = Variable(pos), Variable(neg)

        pos = F.cosine_similarity(output, pos)
        if neg.size()[0] == 0:
            return torch.mean(F.logsigmoid(pos))
        neg = F.cosine_similarity(output.expand_as(neg), neg)

        return torch.mean(F.logsigmoid(pos - neg))

    loss = map(f, outputs, session)
return -torch.mean(torch.cat(loss))

Training code:

    # zero the parameter gradients
    model.zero_grad()

    # forward + backward + optimize
    outputs, hidden = model(inputs, hidden)
    loss = _loss(outputs, session, items)
    acc_loss += loss.data[0]

    loss.backward()
    # Add parameters' gradients to their values, multiplied by learning rate
    for p in model.parameters():
        p.data.add_(-learning_rate, p.grad.data)
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

The problem is from my training loop: it doesn’t detach or repackage the hidden state in between batches? If so, then loss.backward() is trying to back-propagate all the way through to the start of time, which works for the first batch but not for the second because the graph for the first batch has been discarded.

there are two possible solutions.

1) detach/repackage the hidden state in between batches. There are (at least) three ways to do this (and I chose this solution):

 hidden.detach_()
 hidden = hidden.detach()

2) replace loss.backward() with loss.backward(retain_graph=True) but know that each successive batch will take more time than the previous one because it will have to back-propagate all the way through to the start of the first batch.

Example


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...