I have a WCF service that lives side-by-side with an MVC2 web site. I'd like for my URL for the service to look like this:
http://localhost/projdir/Service
The MVC site is in its infancy so it still has all its boilerplate controllers etc.
The following code works at first glance in global.asax:
public static void RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes)
{
routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}");
routes.Add(new ServiceRoute("Service", new ServiceHostFactory(),
typeof(MyService)));
routes.MapRoute(
"Default", // Route name
"{controller}/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index",
id = UrlParameter.Optional } // Parameter defaults
);
}
The service appears just where I described and works as advertised. Great.
However, I just noticed that ordering my code this way changes all of my ActionLink
's. For example, the "About" tab on the MVC site now appears like this:
http://localhost/projdir/Service?action=About&controller=Home
This is obviously incorrect (it should be http://localhost/projdir/Home/About/
).
If I move the ServiceRoute
addition below the default MapRoute()
call, then I get a missing controller error. (Actually I get a "StructureMapControllerFactory did not return an instance of a controller" error, because I'm wired up with StructureMap, duh, it's not a controller to begin with.)
Interestingly, it only seems to be affecting the output of Html.ActionLink()
. I can manually type in http://localhost/projdir/Home/About/
and get to the correct page.
What horribly obvious newbie mistake am I making?
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…