Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
867 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

reactjs - React Hook useEffect has a missing dependency: 'dispatch'

This is my first time working with react js , im trying to remove the alert when leaving this view cause i don't want to show it on the other view but in case that there is no error i want to keep the success alert to show it when i'm gonna redirect to the other view

but im getting this wearning on google chrome Line 97:6: React Hook useEffect has a missing dependency: 'dispatch'. Either include it or remove the dependency array react-hooks/exhaustive-deps

if i did include dispatch i get infinite loop

const [state, dispatch] = useUserStore();
useEffect(() => {
    let token = params.params.token;
    checktoken(token, dispatch);
  }, [params.params.token]);

  useEffect(() => {
    return () => {
      if (state.alert.msg === "Error") {
        dispatch({
          type: REMOVE_ALERT
        });
      }
    };
  }, [state.alert.msg]);

//response from the api
if (!token_valide || token_valide_message === "done") {
      return <Redirect to="/login" />;
    }

this is useUserStore

  const globalReducers = useCombinedReducers({
    alert: useReducer(alertReducer, alertInitState),
    auth: useReducer(authReducer, authInitState),
    register: useReducer(registerReducer, registerInitState),
    token: useReducer(passeditReducer, tokenvalidationInitState)
  });
  return (
    <appStore.Provider value={globalReducers}>{children}</appStore.Provider>
  );
};

export const useUserStore = () => useContext(appStore);
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

dispatch comes from a custom hook so it doesn't have an stable signature therefore will change on each render (reference equality). Add an aditional layer of dependencies by wrapping the handler inside an useCallback hook

   const [foo, dispatch] = myCustomHook()
  
   const stableDispatch = useCallback(dispatch, []) //assuming that it doesn't need to change

   useEffect(() =>{
        stableDispatch(foo)
   },[stableDispatch])

useCallback and useMemo are helper hooks with the main purpose off adding an extra layer of dependency check to ensure synchronicity. Usually you want to work with useCallback to ensure a stable signature to a prop that you know how will change and React doesn't.

A function(reference type) passed via props for example

const Component = ({ setParentState }) =>{
    useEffect(() => setParentState('mounted'), [])
}

Lets assume you have a child component which uppon mounting must set some state in the parent (not usual), the above code will generate a warning of undeclared dependency in useEffect, so let's declare setParentState as a dependency to be checked by React

const Component = ({ setParentState }) =>{
    useEffect(() => setParentState('mounted'), [setParentState])
}

Now this effect runs on each render, not only on mounting, but on each update. This happens because setParentState is a function which is recreated every time the function Component gets called. You know that setParentState won't change it's signature overtime so it's safe to tell React that. By wrapping the original helper inside an useCallback you're doing exactly that (adding another dependency check layer).

const Component = ({ setParentState }) =>{
   const stableSetter = useCallback(() => setParentState(), [])

   useEffect(() => setParentState('mounted'), [stableSetter])
}

There you go. Now React knows that stableSetter won't change it's signature inside the lifecycle therefore the effect do not need too run unecessarily.

On a side note useCallback it's also used like useMemo, to optmize expensive function calls (memoization).

The two mai/n purposes of useCallback are

  • Optimize child components that rely on reference equality to prevent unnecessary renders. Font

  • Memoize expensive calculations

UPDATE 09/11/2020

This solution is no longer needed on [email protected] and above.

Now useMemo and useCallback can safely receive referential types as dependencies.#19590

function MyComponent() {
  const foo = ['a', 'b', 'c']; // <== This array is reconstructed each render
  const normalizedFoo = useMemo(() => foo.map(expensiveMapper), [foo]);
  return <OtherComponent foo={normalizedFoo} />
}

Here is another example of how to safely stabilize(normalize) a callback

const Parent = () => {
    const [message, setMessage] = useState('Greetings!')

    return (
        <h3>
            { message }
        </h3>
        <Child setter={setMessage} />
    )
}

const Child = ({
    setter
}) => {
    const stableSetter = useCallback(args => {
        console.log('Only firing on mount!')
        return setter(args)
    }, [setter])

    useEffect(() => {
        stableSetter('Greetings from child's mount cycle')
    }, [stableSetter]) //now shut up eslint

    const [count, setCount] = useState(0)

    const add = () => setCount(c => c + 1)

    return (
        <button onClick={add}>
            Rerender {count}
        </button>
    )
}

Now referential types with stable signature such as those provenients from useState or useDispatch can safely be used inside an effect without triggering exhaustive-deps even when coming from props

Edit silly-andras-9v1yp


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

56.8k users

...