sql server - Should I get rid of clustered indexes on Guid columns

Question

I am working on a database that usually uses GUIDs as primary keys.

By default SQL Server places a clustered index on primary key columns. I understand that this is a silly idea for GUID columns, and that non-clustered indexes are better.

What do you think - should I get rid of all the clustered indexes and replace them with non-clustered indexes?

Why wouldn't SQL's performance tuner offer this as a recommendation?

Answer 1

A big reason for a clustered index is when you often want to retrieve rows for a range of values for a given column. Because the data is physically arranged in that order, the rows can be extracted very efficiently.

Something like a GUID, while excellent for a primary key, could be positively detrimental to performance, as there will be additional cost for inserts and no perceptible benefit on selects.

So yes, don't cluster an index on GUID.

As to why it's not offered as a recommendation, I'd suggest the tuner is aware of this fact.