Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
452 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

sql server - .NET, the SqlConnection object, and multi-threading

We have an application which uses an SQL Server 2008 R2 database. Within the application, calls to the database are made using a SqlConnection object.

This SqlConnection object is initialized once, the first time it is accessed, and then re-used throughout the application. The action that we use is the following:

Protected _cn As SqlConnection = Nothing

...

Protected Sub Open()
    If _cn Is Nothing Then
        _cn = New SqlConnection(_sqlConn)
    End If

    If _cn.State = ConnectionState.Closed OrElse _cn.State = ConnectionState.Broken Then
        _cn.Open()
    End If
End Sub

This works perfectly fine during normal execution of the program. However, there are a few portions of the application that are executed in a multi-threaded fashion. When one of these parts is executing, frequent errors occur if other actions are made.

After digging a bit, I realised that this is because there were times where two different threads both attempted to use the same SqlConnection object.

So, after identifying the problem, I now need to find solutions. The obvious solution is to just re-create the SqlConnection object every time a database call requires one - in this case, it would never be shared. Is there any reason not to do this? I assumed originally that we had only one connection object per session of the application for performance reasons, but is this actually the case?

If we do need to keep just one connection object open, what is the suggested solution? Should I put in place some sort of timer which will keep cycling until the connection object is available, and then access it?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

The obvious solution is to just re-create the SqlConnection object every time a database call requires one - in this case, it would never be shared. Is there any reason not to do this?

On the contrary, that's absolutely what you should do. That's the behaviour SqlConnection was designed for. You should use a Using statement to automatically close the connection at the end of the block you're using it for, and the connection pool mechanism will automatically handle the real underlying connections to the database.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...