/
vs //
in general
Both child
(/
) and descendant-or-self
(//
) are axes in XPath.
/
is short for /child::node()/
.
Use /
to select a node's immediate children.
//
is short for /descendant-or-self::node()/
.
Use //
to select
a node, its children, its grandchildren, and so on
recursively.
/
vs //
with preceding-sibling::*
Your specific question asks about the difference between //preceding-sibling::*
and /preceding-sibling::*
.
Since your data is offsite and complex, let's consider instead this present and simpler XML:
<r>
<a/>
<b>
<c/>
<d/>
</b>
</r>
For this XML,
/r/preceding-sibling::*
selects nothing because r
has no
preceding siblings.
/r//preceding-sibling::*
selects the preceding siblings elements of
all of the descendant or self nodes of r
. That is, a
, b
, c
and d
.
(Remember, /r//preceding-sibling::*
is short for /descendant-or-self::node()/preceding-sibling::*
, not /descendant-or-self::*/preceding-sibling::*
) Note that even though b
and d
are predecessor siblings to no elements, they are predecessor siblings to text nodes because the above XML has whitespace after b
and d
. If all whitespace were removed, then only a
and c
would be selected.
/r/descendant::*/preceding-sibling::*
selects the preceding sibling elements of all descendant elements of r
. That is, a
and c
. Note that b
and d
are not selected because they are not preceding sibling elements to any descendant elements of r
-- unlike the previous example, text nodes do not qualify.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…