If I try to compile the following C++0x code, I get an error:
template<int n> struct foo { };
struct bar {
static constexpr int number() { return 256; }
void function(foo<number()> &);
};
With gcc 4.6.1, the error message is:
test.cc:6:27: error: ‘static constexpr int bar::number()’ used before its definition
test.cc:6:28: note: in template argument for type ‘int’
With clang 2.8, the error message is:
test.cc:6:20: error: non-type template argument of type 'int' is not an integral
constant expression
void function(foo<number()> &);
^~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
If I move the constexpr
function to a base class, it works on gcc, and gives the same error message on clang:
template<int n> struct foo { };
struct base {
static constexpr int number() { return 256; }
};
struct bar : base {
void function(foo<number()> &);
};
Is the code wrong, or is it a limitation or bug on gcc 4.6's implementation of C++0x? If the code is wrong, why is it wrong, and which clauses of the C++11 standard say it is incorrect?
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…