If you have stable ids in your adapter, you can get pretty good results (animations) if you create a new array containing the filtered items and call
recyclerView.swapAdapter(newAdapter, false);
Using swapAdapter hints RecyclerView that it can re-use view holders. (vs in setAdapter, it has to recycle all views and re-create because it does not know that the new adapter has the same ViewHolder set with the old adapter).
A better approach would be finding which items are removed and calling notifyItemRemoved(index)
. Don't forget to actually remove the item. This will let RecyclerView run predictive animations. Assuming you have an Adapter that internally uses an ArrayList, implementation would look like this:
// adapter code
final List<ItemData> mItems = new ArrayList(); //contains your items
public void filterOut(String filter) {
final int size = mItems.size();
for(int i = size - 1; i>= 0; i--) {
if (mItems.get(i).test(filter) == false) {
mItems.remove(i);
notifyItemRemoved(i);
}
}
}
It would perform even better if you can batch notifyItemRemoved
calls and use notifyItemRangeRemoved
instead. It would look sth like: (not tested)
public void filterOut(String filter) {
final int size = mItems.size();
int batchCount = 0; // continuous # of items that are being removed
for(int i = size - 1; i>= 0; i--) {
if (mItems.get(i).test(filter) == false) {
mItems.remove(i);
batchCount ++;
} else if (batchCount != 0) { // dispatch batch
notifyItemRangeRemoved(i + 1, batchCount);
batchCount = 0;
}
}
// notify for remaining
if (batchCount != 0) { // dispatch remaining
notifyItemRangeRemoved(0, batchCount);
}
}
You need to extend this code to add items that were previously filtered out but now should be visible (e.g. user deletes the filter query) but I think this one should give the basic idea.
Keep in mind that, each notify item call affects the ones after it (which is why I'm traversing the list from end to avoid it). Traversing from end also helps ArrayList's remove method performance (less items to shift).
For example, if you were traversing the list from the beginning and remove the first two items.
You should either call
notifyItemRangeRemoved(0, 2); // 2 items starting from index 0
or if you dispatch them one by one
notifyItemRemoved(0);
notifyItemRemoved(0);//because after the previous one is removed, this item is at position 0
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…