Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
171 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

android - RecyclerView change data set

I want to implement search functionality for my RecyclerView. On text changed i want to change the data that are displayed with this widget. Maybe this question has been asked before or is simple, but I don't know how the change the data that is to be shown...

My RecyclerView is defined as follows:

     // 1. get a reference to recyclerView
    mRecyclerView = (RecyclerView)findViewById(R.id.recyclerView);

    // 2. set layoutManger
    mRecyclerView.setLayoutManager(new LinearLayoutManager(this));
    // 3. create an adapter
    mAdapter = new ItemsAdapter(itemsData);
    // 4. set adapter
    mRecyclerView.setAdapter(mAdapter);

And the data that I am showing is something like:

   ItemData itemsData[] = { new ItemData("Mary Richards"),
        new ItemData("Tom Brown"),
        new ItemData("Lucy London")          
};

So when when I want to give the adapter another set of data, another array (with one item for example), what should I do?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

If you have stable ids in your adapter, you can get pretty good results (animations) if you create a new array containing the filtered items and call

recyclerView.swapAdapter(newAdapter, false);

Using swapAdapter hints RecyclerView that it can re-use view holders. (vs in setAdapter, it has to recycle all views and re-create because it does not know that the new adapter has the same ViewHolder set with the old adapter).

A better approach would be finding which items are removed and calling notifyItemRemoved(index). Don't forget to actually remove the item. This will let RecyclerView run predictive animations. Assuming you have an Adapter that internally uses an ArrayList, implementation would look like this:

// adapter code
final List<ItemData> mItems = new ArrayList(); //contains your items
public void filterOut(String filter) {
   final int size = mItems.size();
   for(int i = size - 1; i>= 0; i--) {
       if (mItems.get(i).test(filter) == false) {
           mItems.remove(i);
           notifyItemRemoved(i);
       }
   }
}

It would perform even better if you can batch notifyItemRemoved calls and use notifyItemRangeRemoved instead. It would look sth like: (not tested)

public void filterOut(String filter) {
   final int size = mItems.size();
   int batchCount = 0; // continuous # of items that are being removed
   for(int i = size - 1; i>= 0; i--) {
       if (mItems.get(i).test(filter) == false) {
           mItems.remove(i);
           batchCount ++;
       } else if (batchCount != 0) { // dispatch batch
           notifyItemRangeRemoved(i + 1, batchCount);
           batchCount = 0;
       }
   }
   // notify for remaining
   if (batchCount != 0) { // dispatch remaining
       notifyItemRangeRemoved(0, batchCount);
   }
}

You need to extend this code to add items that were previously filtered out but now should be visible (e.g. user deletes the filter query) but I think this one should give the basic idea.

Keep in mind that, each notify item call affects the ones after it (which is why I'm traversing the list from end to avoid it). Traversing from end also helps ArrayList's remove method performance (less items to shift).

For example, if you were traversing the list from the beginning and remove the first two items. You should either call

notifyItemRangeRemoved(0, 2); // 2 items starting from index 0

or if you dispatch them one by one

notifyItemRemoved(0);
notifyItemRemoved(0);//because after the previous one is removed, this item is at position 0

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...