This question on the object generator pattern got me thinking about ways to automate it.
Essentially, I want to automate the creation of functions like std::make_pair
, std::bind1st
and std::mem_fun
so that instead of having to write a different function for each template class type, you could write a single variadic template template function that handles all cases at once. Usage of this function would be like:
make<std::pair>(1, 2); // equivalent to std::make_pair(1, 2)
make<std::binder2nd>(&foo, 3); // equivalent to std::bind2nd(&foo, 3);
Is it possible to write this function make
? I have tried this, but it doesn't work in GCC 4.5 or 4.6:
template <template <typename...> class TemplateClass, typename... Args>
TemplateClass<Args...> make(Args&&... args)
{
return TemplateClass<Args...>(std::forward<Args>(args)...);
}
If I try to call (e.g) make<std::pair>(1, 2)
I just get
error: no matching function for call to 'make(int, int)'
Have I got the syntax wrong anywhere here?
Or is this right and GCC is wrong?
Or is this just fundamentally impossible in C++0x?
[edit]
Proposal N2555 seems to suggest that this is allowed and GCC claims to have implemented it in GCC4.4.
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…