I have a number of classes that I cannot modify. Each has a copy constructor, at least one other constructor, and a function foo()
that returns some value. I want to make a class template that can derive from each of these classes, and has a data member that is the same type as the return type of foo()
(sorry if I've got some of the terminology wrong).
In other words, I would like a class template
template<typename T> class C : public T
{
footype fooresult;
};
where footype
is the return type of T::foo()
.
If the base classes all had, say, a default constructor, I could do
decltype(T().foo()) fooresult;
(with the C++0x functionality in GCC) but the classes don't have any particular constructor in common, apart from the copy constructors.
GCC also doesn't allow decltype(this->foo())
, though apparently there is a possibility that this will be added to the C++0x standard - does anyone know how likely that is?
I feel like it should be possible to do something along the lines of decltype(foo())
or decltype(T::foo())
but those don't seem to work: GCC gives an error of the form cannot call member function 'int A::foo()' without object
.
Of course, I could have an extra template parameter footype
, or even a non-class parameter of type T
, but is there any way of avoiding this?
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…