Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
301 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

python - StringIO and compatibility with 'with' statement (context manager)

I have some legacy code with a legacy function that takes a filename as an argument and processes the file contents. A working facsimile of the code is below.

What I want to do is not have to write to disk with some content that I generate in order to use this legacy function, so I though I could use StringIO to create an object in place of the physical filename. However, this does not work, as you can see below.

I thought StringIO was the way to go with this. Can anyone tell me if there is a way to use this legacy function and pass it something in the argument that isn't a file on disk but can be treated as such by the legacy function? The legacy function does have the with context manager doing work on the filename parameter value.

The one thing I came across in google was: http://bugs.python.org/issue1286, but that didn't help me...

Code

from pprint import pprint
import StringIO

    # Legacy Function
def processFile(filename):
    with open(filename, 'r') as fh:
        return fh.readlines()

    # This works
print 'This is the output of FileOnDisk.txt'
pprint(processFile('c:/temp/FileOnDisk.txt'))
print

    # This fails
plink_data = StringIO.StringIO('StringIO data.')
print 'This is the error.'
pprint(processFile(plink_data))

Output

This is the output in FileOnDisk.txt:

['This file is on disk.
']

This is the error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:empest.py", line 20, in <module>
    pprint(processFile(plink_data))
  File "C:empest.py", line 6, in processFile
    with open(filename, 'r') as fh:
TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, instance found
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

A StringIO instance is an open file already. The open command, on the other hand, only takes filenames, to return an open file. A StringIO instance is not suitable as a filename.

Also, you don't need to close a StringIO instance, so there is no need to use it as a context manager either. While closing an instance frees the memory allocated, so does simply letting the garbage collector reap the object. At any rate, the contextlib.closing() context manager could take care of closing the object if you want to ensure freeing the memory while still holding a reference to the object.

If all your legacy code can take is a filename, then a StringIO instance is not the way to go. Use the tempfile module to generate a temporary filename instead.

Here is an example using a contextmanager to ensure the temp file is cleaned up afterwards:

import os
import tempfile
from contextlib import contextmanager

@contextmanager
def tempinput(data):
    temp = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(delete=False)
    temp.write(data)
    temp.close()
    try:
        yield temp.name
    finally:
        os.unlink(temp.name)

with tempinput('Some data.
Some more data.') as tempfilename:
    processFile(tempfilename)

You can also switch to the newer Python 3 infrastructure offered by the io module (available in Python 2 and 3), where io.BytesIO is the more robust replacement for StringIO.StringIO / cStringIO.StringIO. This object does support being used as a context manager (but still can't be passed to open()).


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...