I saw a question the other day where someone inadvertently used an incomplete type by specifying something like
struct a {
int q;
};
struct A *x;
x->q = 3;
The compiler knew that struct A
was a struct, despite A
being totally undefined, by virtue of the struct
keyword.
That was in C++, where such usage of struct
is atypical (and, it turns out, can lead to foot-shooting). In C if you do
typedef struct a {
...
} a;
then you can use a
as the typename and omit the struct
later. This will lead the compiler to give you an undefined identifier error later, rather than incomplete type, if you mistype the name or forget a header.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…