Let's say I have such interface and concrete implementation
public interface IMyInterface<T>
{
T My();
}
public class MyConcrete : IMyInterface<string>
{
public string My()
{
return string.Empty;
}
}
So I create MyConcrete implementation for strings
, I can have one more concrete implementation for int
. And that's ok. But let's say, that I want to do the same thing, but with generic methods, so I have
public interface IMyInterface2
{
T My<T>();
}
public class MyConcrete2 : IMyInterface2
{
public string My<string>()
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
So I have the same IMyInterface2
, but which defines generic behavior by means of T My<T>()
. In my concrete class I want to implement My
behavior, but for concrete data type - string
. But C# doesn't allow me to do that.
My question is why I cannot do that?
In other words, if i can create concrete implementation of MyInterface<T>
as MyClass : MyInterface<string>
and stop genericness at this point, why I can't do that with generic method - T My<T>()
?
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…