Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
136 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++ - Converting statvfs to percentage free correctly

I have a terribly uncomplicated test program that prints out the following numbers.

i.e.

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
  struct statvfs vfs;
  statvfs(argv[1], &vfs);
  printf("f_bsize (block size): %lu
"
       "f_frsize (fragment size): %lu
"
       "f_blocks (size of fs in f_frsize units): %lu
"
       "f_bfree (free blocks): %lu
"
       "f_bavail free blocks for unprivileged users): %lu
"
       "f_files (inodes): %lu
"
       "f_ffree (free inodes): %lu
"
       "f_favail (free inodes for unprivileged users): %lu
"
       "f_fsid (file system ID): %lu
"
       "f_flag (mount flags): %lu
"
       "f_namemax (maximum filename length)%lu
",
       vfs.f_bsize,
       vfs.f_frsize,
       vfs.f_blocks,
       vfs.f_bfree,
       vfs.f_bavail,
       vfs.f_files,
       vfs.f_ffree,
       vfs.f_favail,
       vfs.f_fsid,
       vfs.f_flag,
       vfs.f_namemax);

       return 0;
    }

Prints out:

f_bsize (block size): 4096
f_frsize (fragment size): 4096
f_blocks (size of fs in f_frsize units): 10534466
f_bfree (free blocks): 6994546
f_bavail free blocks for unprivileged users): 6459417
f_files (inodes): 2678784
f_ffree (free inodes): 2402069
f_favail (free inodes for unprivileged users): 2402069
f_fsid (file system ID): 12719298601114463092
f_flag (mount flags): 4096
f_namemax (maximum filename length)255

df prints out for the root fs:

Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda5             42137864  14159676  25837672  36% /

But here is where I'm confused.

25837672+14159676 != 42137846 (actually 39997348)

Therefore if I were to do the calc 14159676 / 42137864 * 100 I get 33% not 36% as df prints.

But if I calc

14159676 / 39997348 * 100 I get 35%.

Why all the discrepencies and where is df getting the number 42137864? Is it related to some conversion to 1k blocks vs the actual system block size which is 4k?

This will be integrated into my caching app to tell me when the drive is at some threshold... e.g. 90% before I start freeing fixed size blocks that are sized in 2^n sizing. So what I'm after is a function that gives me a reasonably accurate %used.

EDIT: I can now match what df prints. Except for the %Used. It makes we wonder how accurate all this is. What is the fragment size?

unsigned long total = vfs.f_blocks * vfs.f_frsize / 1024;
unsigned long available = vfs.f_bavail * vfs.f_frsize / 1024;
unsigned long free = vfs.f_bfree * vfs.f_frsize / 1024;

printf("Total: %luK
", total);
printf("Available: %luK
", available);
printf("Used: %luK
", total - free);

EDIT2:

unsigned long total = vfs.f_blocks * vfs.f_frsize / 1024;
unsigned long available = vfs.f_bavail * vfs.f_frsize / 1024;
unsigned long free = vfs.f_bfree * vfs.f_frsize / 1024;
unsigned long used = total - free;

printf("Total: %luK
", total);
printf("Available: %luK
", available);
printf("Used: %luK
", used);
printf("Free: %luK
", free);

// Calculate % used based on f_bavail not f_bfree.  This is still giving out a different answer to df???
printf("Use%%: %f%%
",  (vfs.f_blocks - vfs.f_bavail) / (double)(vfs.f_blocks) * 100.0); 

f_bsize (block size): 4096
f_frsize (fragment size): 4096
f_blocks (size of fs in f_frsize units): 10534466
f_bfree (free blocks): 6994182
f_bavail (free blocks for unprivileged users): 6459053
f_files (inodes): 2678784
f_ffree (free inodes): 2402056
f_favail (free inodes for unprivileged users): 2402056
f_fsid (file system ID): 12719298601114463092
f_flag (mount flags): 4096
f_namemax (maximum filename length)255
Total: 42137864K
Available: 25836212K
Used: 14161136K
Free: 27976728K
Use%: 38.686470%

matth@kubuntu:~/dev$ df
Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda5             42137864  14161136  25836212  36% /

I get 38% not 36. If calculated by f_bfree I get 33%. Is df wrong or is this just never going to be accurate? If this is the case then I want to lean on the side of being conservative.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

df's data may be based on f_bavail, not f_bfree. You may find it helpful to look at the source code to df to see how it does things. It has a number of edge cases it needs to deal with (eg, when the used space exceeds the amount of space available to non-root users), but the relevant code for the normal case is here:

  uintmax_t u100 = used * 100;
  uintmax_t nonroot_total = used + available;
  pct = u100 / nonroot_total + (u100 % nonroot_total != 0);

In other words, 100 * used / (used + available), rounded up. Plugging in the values from your df output gives 100 * 14159676 / (14159676 + 25837672) = 35.4015371, which rounded up is 36%, just as df calculated.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...