c++ - How to unwind the stack to get backtrace for the specified stack pointer (SP)?

Question

I'm writing this for Android (ARM only), but I believe the principle is the same for generic Linux as well.

I'm trying to capture the stack trace from within the signal handler, so that I can log it when my app crashes. This is what I've come up with using <unwind.h>.
Initialization:

struct sigaction signalhandlerDescriptor;
memset(&signalhandlerDescriptor, 0, sizeof(signalhandlerDescriptor));
signalhandlerDescriptor.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
signalhandlerDescriptor._u._sa_sigaction = signalHandler;
sigaction(SIGSEGV, &signalhandlerDescriptor, 0);

The code itself:

struct BacktraceState
{
    void** current;
    void** end;
    void* pc;
};

inline _Unwind_Reason_Code unwindCallback(struct _Unwind_Context* context, void* arg)
{
    BacktraceState* state = static_cast<BacktraceState*>(arg);
    state->pc = (void*)_Unwind_GetIP(context);
    if (state->pc)
    {
        if (state->current == state->end)
            return _URC_END_OF_STACK;
        else
            *state->current++ = reinterpret_cast<void*>(state->pc);
    }
    return _URC_NO_REASON;
}

inline size_t captureBacktrace(void** addrs, size_t max, unsigned long pc)
{
    BacktraceState state = {addrs, addrs + max, (void*)pc};
    _Unwind_Backtrace(unwindCallback, &state);
    personality_routine();

    return state.current - addrs;
}

inline void dumpBacktrace(std::ostream& os, void** addrs, size_t count)
{
    for (size_t idx = 0; idx < count; ++idx) {
        const void* addr = addrs[idx];
        const char* symbol = "";

        Dl_info info;
        if (dladdr(addr, &info) && info.dli_sname) {
            symbol = info.dli_sname;
        }

        int status = -3;
        char * demangledName = abi::__cxa_demangle(symbol, 0, 0, &status);
        os << "#" << idx << ": " << addr << "  " << (status == 0 ? demangledName : symbol) << "
";
        free(demangledName);
    }
}

void signalHandler(int sig, siginfo_t *siginfo, void *uctx)
{
    ucontext * context = (ucontext*)uctx;
    unsigned long PC = context->uc_mcontext.arm_pc;
    unsigned long SP = context->uc_mcontext.arm_sp;

    Logger() << __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ << "Fatal signal:" << sig;
    const size_t maxNumAddresses = 50;
    void* addresses[maxNumAddresses];
    std::ostringstream oss;

    const size_t actualNumAddresses = captureBacktrace(addresses, maxNumAddresses, PC);
    dumpBacktrace(oss, addresses, actualNumAddresses);
    Logger() << oss.str();
    exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}

Problem: if I get the PC register by calling _Unwind_GetIP(context) in unwindCallback, I get the complete trace for the signal handler stack. Which is a separate stack, and that's obviously not what I want. So I tried supplying the PC taken from the ucontext in signal handler, and got a weird result: I get one stack entry, it is the correct entry - the function which caused the signal in the first place. But it's logged twice (even the address is the same, so it's not a symbolic name look up bug). Obviously, that's not good enough - I need the whole stack. And I wonder if this result is merely accidental (i. e. it shouldn't work in general.

Now, I read I need to also supply the stack pointer, which I apparently can get from ucontext, same as PC. But I don't know what to do with it. Do I have to unwind manually instead of using _Unwind_Backtrace? If so, can you give me sample code? I've been searching for the better part of a day, and still couldn't find anything I could copy and paste into my project.

For what it's worth, here's the libunwind source which contains _Unwind_Backtrace definition. Thought I could figure something out if I see its source, but it's way more complicated than I expected.

Answer 1

In order to to get stacktrace of code which caused SIGSEGV instead of stacktrace of the signal handler, you have to get ARM registers from ucontext_t and use them for unwinding.

But it is hard to do with _Unwind_Backtrace(). Thus, if you use libc++ (LLVM STL), better try precompiled libunwind for 32-bit ARM, bundled with modern Android NDKs (at sources/cxx-stl/llvm-libc++/libs/armeabi-v7a/libunwind.a). Here is a sample code.

---

// This method can only be used on 32-bit ARM with libc++ (LLVM STL).
// Android NDK r16b contains "libunwind.a" for armeabi-v7a ABI.
// This library is even silently linked in by the ndk-build,
// so we don't have to add it manually in "Android.mk".
// We can use this library, but we need matching headers,
// namely "libunwind.h" and "__libunwind_config.h".
// For NDK r16b, the headers can be fetched here:
// https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/libunwind_llvm/+/ndk-r16/include/
#if _LIBCPP_VERSION && __has_include("libunwind.h")
#include "libunwind.h"
#endif

struct BacktraceState {
    const ucontext_t*   signal_ucontext;
    size_t              address_count = 0;
    static const size_t address_count_max = 30;
    uintptr_t           addresses[address_count_max] = {};

    BacktraceState(const ucontext_t* ucontext) : signal_ucontext(ucontext) {}

    bool AddAddress(uintptr_t ip) {
        // No more space in the storage. Fail.
        if (address_count >= address_count_max)
            return false;

        // Reset the Thumb bit, if it is set.
        const uintptr_t thumb_bit = 1;
        ip &= ~thumb_bit;

        // Ignore null addresses.
        if (ip == 0)
            return true;

        // Finally add the address to the storage.
        addresses[address_count++] = ip;
        return true;
    }
};

void CaptureBacktraceUsingLibUnwind(BacktraceState* state) {
    assert(state);

    // Initialize unw_context and unw_cursor.
    unw_context_t unw_context = {};
    unw_getcontext(&unw_context);
    unw_cursor_t  unw_cursor = {};
    unw_init_local(&unw_cursor, &unw_context);

    // Get more contexts.
    const ucontext_t* signal_ucontext = state->signal_ucontext;
    assert(signal_ucontext);
    const sigcontext* signal_mcontext = &(signal_ucontext->uc_mcontext);
    assert(signal_mcontext);

    // Set registers.
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R0, signal_mcontext->arm_r0);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R1, signal_mcontext->arm_r1);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R2, signal_mcontext->arm_r2);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R3, signal_mcontext->arm_r3);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R4, signal_mcontext->arm_r4);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R5, signal_mcontext->arm_r5);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R6, signal_mcontext->arm_r6);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R7, signal_mcontext->arm_r7);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R8, signal_mcontext->arm_r8);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R9, signal_mcontext->arm_r9);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R10, signal_mcontext->arm_r10);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R11, signal_mcontext->arm_fp);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R12, signal_mcontext->arm_ip);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R13, signal_mcontext->arm_sp);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R14, signal_mcontext->arm_lr);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_ARM_R15, signal_mcontext->arm_pc);

    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_REG_IP, signal_mcontext->arm_pc);
    unw_set_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_REG_SP, signal_mcontext->arm_sp);

    // unw_step() does not return the first IP.
    state->AddAddress(signal_mcontext->arm_pc);

    // Unwind frames one by one, going up the frame stack.
    while (unw_step(&unw_cursor) > 0) {
        unw_word_t ip = 0;
        unw_get_reg(&unw_cursor, UNW_REG_IP, &ip);

        bool ok = state->AddAddress(ip);
        if (!ok)
            break;
    }
}

void SigActionHandler(int sig, siginfo_t* info, void* ucontext) {
    const ucontext_t* signal_ucontext = (const ucontext_t*)ucontext;
    assert(signal_ucontext);

    BacktraceState backtrace_state(signal_ucontext);
    CaptureBacktraceUsingLibUnwind(&backtrace_state);
    // Do something with the backtrace - print, save to file, etc.
}

---

I am also advising to take a look at this my answer which contains more code and more info:

https://stackoverflow.com/a/50027799/1016580

If you use libstdc++ (GNU STL), use Vasily Galkin's solution:

https://stackoverflow.com/a/30515756/1016580

, which is the same as Dar Hoo's solution from another post:

https://stackoverflow.com/a/48593413/1016580