@_silgen_name
was just recently renamed from @asmname
(see the following commit) with the following commit message:
This reflects the fact that the attribute's only for
compiler-internal use, and isn't really equivalent to C's asm
attribute, since it doesn't change the calling convention to be
C-compatible.
So as a general Swift developer, one wouldn't come across this attribute, unless working with, say, porting Swift to some other platform.
Now, @_silgen_name
is an attribute (macro) for the class SILGenNameAttr
with certain options, where the latter is part of Swifts abstract syntax tree (AST). From the swift/AST/Attr.def
source code (see also swift/lib/AST/Attr.cpp)
// Schema for DECL_ATTR:
//
// - Attribute name.
// - Class name without the 'Attr' suffix (ignored for
// - Options for the attribute, including:
// * the declarations the attribute can appear on
// * whether duplicates are allowed
// * whether the attribute is considered a decl modifier or not (no '@')
// - Unique attribute identifier used for serialization. This
// can never be changed.
//
// SIMPLE_DECL_ATTR is the same, but the class becomes
// SimpleDeclAttr<DAK_##NAME>.
//
DECL_ATTR(_silgen_name, SILGenName,
OnFunc | OnConstructor | OnDestructor | LongAttribute |
UserInaccessible, 0)
We find the declaration of SILGeneNameAttr
in swift/AST/Attr.h:
/// Defines the @_silgen_name attribute.
class SILGenNameAttr : public DeclAttribute {
public:
SILGenNameAttr(StringRef Name, SourceLoc AtLoc, SourceRange Range, bool Implicit)
: DeclAttribute(DAK_SILGenName, AtLoc, Range, Implicit),
Name(Name) {}
SILGenNameAttr(StringRef Name, bool Implicit)
: SILGenNameAttr(Name, SourceLoc(), SourceRange(), /*Implicit=*/true) {}
/// The symbol name.
const StringRef Name;
static bool classof(const DeclAttribute *DA) {
return DA->getKind() == DAK_SILGenName;
}
};
To sum up; it's related to provide a Swift interface for C functions. You will most likely have a hard time finding any details regarding SILGenNameAttr
in the developer library, and can consider it an undocumented feature.
Finally, the following talk with Russ Bishop might be of interest to you:
The Toolbox: Here there be dragons (34:20)
I would not ship this in a production application under any
circumstances. But if you’re feeling adventurous, here they are.
@asmname
is an attribute to decorate a function. You definitely need
to understand the ABI to use this one. Swift will not help you
marshall the parameters very much. The compiler is not going to be
very forgiving, so you have to make sure that you’ve manipulated your
parameters into a format it’s compatible with. The following code
shows how to declare it. Give the function attribute, @asmname
, and
the string symbol; then function its arguments in return type. The
compiler will not complain if you get the arguments wrong or return
type incorrectly. It only expects that that symbol exists, and when it
jumps to it, it better take those arguments and have that return type.
@asmname("dispatch_get_current_queue") func _get_current_queue() -> dispatch_queue_t
Q&A (37:08)
Q: Obviously not all of these are documented by Apple, so what’s your process of discovering all these behaviors?
Russ: I’ll look at the documentation first, but you’re right that there is a lot of stuff that isn’t in there. If you go to the Swift
REPL and use the flag — I think it’s something like
-deprecated-integrated-repl
— you can ask it to print the Swift module and all the bits that Xcode doesn’t show you. If you dig into the
toolchain directory Xcode, you can also find stuff in libswiftCore and
libswiftRuntime.
JP: If you’re interested in doing some more unsafe things with Swift, you can do a code search in GitHub for @asmname
and language
“Swift”, and you’ll see a bunch of really bad but interesting stuff.
A slightly older post from Bishops' blog:
...
First off notice the @asmname
attribute. This is the equivalent of
DllImport
or extern
. It tells Swift that we are going to link in
some library that defines a function with the given name and matching
the given arguments. "Just trust me Swift, I know what I'm doing".
Hint: You had better know what you're doing.