Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
193 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

android - What's the difference between RecyclerView.setItemViewCacheSize and RecycledViewPool.setMaxRecycledViews?

The documentation says that setItemViewCacheSize

sets the number of offscreen views to retain before adding them to the potentially shared recycled view pool.

and setMaxRecycledViews

sets the maximum number of ViewHolders to hold in the pool before discarding.

But don't they both function as a cache where views are taken from (i.e., the first sets the number of views cached by the RV, while the second sets that of the RVP)?

Also, when a view is needed, where is it taken first, from the RVP or from the RV's cache?

And what's the optimal (scrolling-wise, ignoring memory) configuration for the two for a simple unnested recyclerview?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Here's the full documentation for setItemViewCacheSize():

Set the number of offscreen views to retain before adding them to the potentially shared recycled view pool.

The offscreen view cache stays aware of changes in the attached adapter, allowing a LayoutManager to reuse those views unmodified without needing to return to the adapter to rebind them.

In other words, when you scroll the RecyclerView such that there's a view that is just barely completely off-screen, the RecyclerView will keep it around so that you can scroll it back into view without having to re-execute onBindViewHolder().

This is different from the recycled view pool, which is a pool of views that the RecyclerView has said it doesn't need anymore, but which is kept around to avoid the expensive task of inflating new views.

In short, the "item view cache" holds elements in such a way that the RecyclerView can avoid calling both onCreateViewHolder() and onBindViewHolder(), whereas the recycled view pool holds elements such that the RecyclerView can avoid calling onCreateViewHolder() but will still have to call onBindViewHolder().

Also, when a view is needed, where is it taken first, from the RVP or from the RV's cache?

I don't think it really matters, and I don't know of a precise definition, but generally I think you can imagine that views that have just exited the device's viewport and then return to the viewport will be taken from the "item view cache", while views that come on-screen but were not previously on-screen will come from the recycled view pool.

And what's the optimal (scrolling-wise, ignoring memory) configuration for the two for a simple unnested recyclerview?

Just use the defaults. I would never consider changing these unless I had profiled my app and determined beyond a doubt that the defaults weren't working for me. But, if I just take you at your word, ignoring memory, the larger the cache size the better. But really, just use the defaults.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...