This is a compiler error (slightly changed for readability).
This one always puzzled me. FxCop tells that this is a bad thing to return List and classes that arederived from Collection<T>
should be preferrable as return types.
Also, FxCop says that it is OK to use List<T>
for internal data storagemanipulation.
Ok, I get it, but what I don't get is that compiler complains about trying to implicitly convert List<T>
to Collection<T>
. Isn't List<T>
more interface-charged and functional?
Why prohibit implicit conversion?
And another question that stems from above: is new List<int>(some collection<int>)
constructor expensive?
Thank you,
Valentin Vasiliev
See Question&Answers more detail:
os 与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…