Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
235 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++ - How can I assert() without using abort()?

If I use assert() and the assertion fails then assert() will call abort(), ending the running program abruptly. I can't afford that in my production code. Is there a way to assert in runtime yet be able to catch failed assertions so I have the chance to handle them gracefully?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Yes, as a matter of fact there is. You will need to write a custom assert function yourself, as C++'s assert() is exactly C's assert(), with the abort() "feature" bundled in. Fortunately, this is surprisingly straightforward.

Assert.hh

template <typename X, typename A>
inline void Assert(A assertion)
{
    if( !assertion ) throw X();
}

The above function will throw an exception if a predicate doesn't hold. You will then have the chance to catch the exception. If you don't catch the exception, terminate() will be called, which will end the program similarly to abort().

You may wonder what about optimizing away the assertion when we're building for production. In this case, you can define constants that will signify that you're building for production and then refer to the constant when you Assert().

debug.hh

#ifdef NDEBUG
    const bool CHECK_WRONG = false;
#else
    const bool CHECK_WRONG = true;
#endif

main.cc

#include<iostream>

struct Wrong { };

int main()
{
    try {
        Assert<Wrong>(!CHECK_WRONG || 2 + 2 == 5);
        std::cout << "I can go to sleep now.
";
    }
    catch( Wrong e ) {
        std::cerr << "Someone is wrong on the internet!
";
    }

    return 0;
}

If CHECK_WRONG is a constant then the call to Assert() will be compiled away in production, even if the assertion is not a constant expression. There is a slight disadvantage in that by referring to CHECK_WRONG we type a little more. But in exchange we gain an advantage in that we can classify various groups of assertions and enable and disable each of them as we see fit. So, for example we could define a group of assertions that we want enabled even in production code, and then define a group of assertions that we only want to see in development builds.

The Assert() function is equivalent to typing

if( !assertion ) throw X();

but it clearly indicates the intent of the programmer: make an assertion. Assertions are also easier to grep for with this approach, just like plain assert()s.

For more details on this technique see Bjarne Stroustrup's The C++ Programming Language 3e, section 24.3.7.2.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...