Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
187 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

android - Exclude assets for release build type

I'm importing an android library in an application built with gradle, like that:

dependencies {
    compile 'com.example:great-lib:0.1-SNAPSHOT'
}

This library contains only assets, js, css and images to be used in a webview, with a layout like that:

assets/
|-> great.css
|-> great.min.js
|-> great.min.js.map
|-> js/
|   |-> plop.js
|   |-> foo.js
|   ...
|-> img/
|   ...

The js folder contains source files (to be used with source maps). I would like to include it and the .map file for the debug builds, and have only the minified js in release builds, but I can't find a way to do that.

So far I've tried :?

android {
    // this doesn't exclude anything
    packageOptions {
        exclude 'assets/js'
    }
    buildTypes {
        release {
            // this does exclude the js folder, but in both release and debug
            aaptOptions {
                ignoreAssetsPattern "!js"
            }
        }
    }
}

Any idea if what I want is possible to achieve, and if so how?

(I've also thought of publishing two versions of the library (great-lib and great-lib-debug), and have the dependency in debugCompile and releaseCompile, but I'd prefer avoiding that and publishing a single version)

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

I had success with this approach (updated 2019-5-13 for TaskProvider support; see edit history for older versions):

android {
?
    applicationVariants.all { variant ->
        if (variant.buildType.name == 'release') {
            variant.mergeAssetsProvider.configure {
                doLast {
                    delete(fileTree(dir: outputDir, includes: ['**/js', '**/*.js.map']))
                }
            }
        }
    }
?
}

This should address the issues with @Xavier's answer:

  • The deletion is done as part of the variant's mergeAssets task so the deletion is reflected in the task's output and up-to-date checking should be unaffected.
  • The paths are calculated without magic strings. You may need to adjust the include patterns in case my example is too permissive.
  • The variant is being selected by the buildType name, which is less problematic than matching the entire variant name (though it is still stringly typed).

Note that this approach also works for res files rather than assets: just replace mergeAssets with mergeResources.

Other answers mentioning packagingOptions and aaptOptions are barking up the wrong tree, as these are scoped to all variants (they are defined in the android scope, not buildType or productFlavor).


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...