Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
204 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

gcc4 - GCC 4.5 vs 4.4 linking with dependencies

I am observing a difference when trying to do the same operation on GCC 4.4 and GCC 4.5. Because the code I am doing this with is proprietary, I am unable to provide it, but I am observing a similar failure with this simple test case.

What I am basically trying to do is have one shared library (libb) depend on another shared library (liba). When loading libb, I assume that liba should be loaded as well - even though libb is not necessarily using the symbols in liba.

What I am observing is when I compile with GCC 4.4, I observe that the liba is loaded, but if I compile with GCC 4.5, libb is not loaded.

I have a small test case that consists of two files, a.c and b.c . The contents of the files:

//a.c
int a(){ 
    return 0; 
}

//b.c
int b(){
    return 0;
}
//c.c
#include <stdio.h>
int a();
int b();

int main()
{
    printf("%d
", a()+b());
    return 0;
}
//test.sh    
$CC -o liba.so a.c -shared
$CC -o libb.so b.c -shared -L. -la -Wl,-rpath-link .
$CC c.c -L. -lb -Wl,-rpath-link .
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./a.out

This is my output with different versions of GCC

$ CC=gcc-4.4 ./test.sh
1
$ CC=gcc-4.5 ./test.sh
/tmp/cceJhAqy.o: In function `main':
c.c:(.text+0xf): undefined reference to `a'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
./test.sh: line 4: ./a.out: No such file or directory
$ CC=gcc-4.6 ./test.sh
/tmp/ccoovR0x.o: In function `main':
c.c:(.text+0xf): undefined reference to `a'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
./test.sh: line 4: ./a.out: No such file or directory
$ 

Can anyone explain what is happening? Another extra bit of information is that ldd on libb.so does show liba.so on GCC 4.4 but not on GCC 4.5.

EDIT

I changed test.sh to the following:

$CC -shared -o liba.so a.c
$CC -L. -Wl,--no-as-needed -Wl,--copy-dt-needed-entries -la -shared -o libb.so b.c -Wl,-rpath-link . 
$CC -L. c.c -lb -Wl,-rpath-link . 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./a.out

This gave the following output with GCC 4.5:

/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/cc5IJ8Ks.o: undefined reference to symbol 'a'
/usr/bin/ld: note: 'a' is defined in DSO ./liba.so so try adding it to the linker command line
./liba.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
./test.sh: line 4: ./a.out: No such file or directory
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

There seems to have been changes in how DT_NEEDED libraries are treated during linking by ld. Here's the relevant part of current man ld:

With --copy-dt-needed-entries dynamic libraries mentioned on the command line will be recursively searched, following their DT_NEEDED tags to other libraries, in order to resolve symbols required by the output binary. With the default setting however the searching of dynamic libraries that follow it will stop with the dynamic library itself. No DT_NEEDED links will be traversed to resolve symbols.

(part of the --copy-dt-needed-entries section).

Some time between GCC 4.4 and GCC 4.5 (apparently, see some reference here - can't find anything really authoritative), the default was changed from the recursive search, to no recursive search (as you are seeing with the newer GCCs).

In any case, you can (and should) fix it by specifying liba in your final link step:

$CC c.c -L. -lb -la -Wl,-rpath-link .

You can check that this linker setting is indeed (at least part of) the issue by running with your newer compilers and this command line:

$CC c.c -L. -Wl,--copy-dt-needed-entries -lb -Wl,--no-copy-dt-needed-entries 
         -Wl,-rpath-link .

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...